Simmons, Lisa, Barker, Ruth, Barnett, Fiona, and McGuckin, Teneale (2025) Consensus Challenges in Clinical Placement Evaluation: Insights From a Modified Delphi Study. In: [Presented at the the 16th National Allied Health Conference]. From: 16th National Allied Health Conference: Empowering Lives, Shaping Healthcare, 11-13 August 2025, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

PDF (Poster) - Presentation Restricted to Repository staff only

Abstract

Background: Evaluating clinical placement performance is crucial for ensuring high-quality learning experiences in health professional education. This study used a Modified Delphi approach to examine expert consensus on key measurement areas and the effectiveness of tools used to assess placement performance.

Method: In Rounds 2 and 3 of a Modified Delphi study, experts identified and ranked tools used to evaluate clinical placements. Open-ended responses were analysed inductively to determine commonly used approaches. Experts then rated each tool's effectiveness using a Likert scale, with consensus set at ≥ 75% agreement.

Findings: While consensus was achieved for key measurement areas, significant variability existed in preferred assessment tools, reflecting differences in institutional practices, disciplinary expectations, and stakeholder perspectives. Consensus was stronger for tools measuring student learning outcomes compared to those assessing placement experiences, suggesting that educational outcomes are more systematically understood. Key challenges included limited empirical validation of tools, reliance on subjective assessments, and difficulties in measuring competencies such as workplace resilience and coping mechanisms.

Conclusion:Experts emphasised the need for a multi-method evaluation approach, integrating competency-based assessments, observational methods, and structured feedback mechanisms. However, the Delphi method proved less effective for tool selection, demonstrating the importance of an alternative research approach to consensus-building. Future research should focus on real-world application in specific clinical placement settings, ensuring that placement evaluation tools are both applicable and relevant. A flexible framework for tool selection is recommended to address standardisation challenges while maintaining disciplinary relevance.

Item ID:	87227
Item Type:	Conference Item (Poster)
Keywords:	Clinical Placement Performance Evaluation
Related URLs:	Publisher
Date Deposited:	16 Sep 2025 00:07
FoR Codes:	39 EDUCATION > 3999 Other Education > 399999 Other education not elsewhere classified @ 50% 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science > 420199 Allied health and rehabilitation science not elsewhere classified @ 50%
SEO Codes:	16 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 1601 Learner and learning > 160102 Higher education @ 33% 16 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 1601 Learner and learning > 160104 Professional development and adult education @ 34% 20 HEALTH > 2099 Other health > 209999 Other health not elsewhere classified @ 33%
	More Statistics