Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays

Lawson, Julia M., Fordham, Sonja V., O'Malley, Mary P., Davidson, Lindsay N.K., Walls, Rachel H.L., Heupel, Michelle, Stevens, Guy, Fernando, Daniel, Budziak, Ania, Simpfendorfer, Colin A., Ender, Anna Isabel, Francis, Malcolm P., di Sciara, Giuseppe Notarbartolo, and Dulvy, Nicholas K. (2017) Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays. PeerJ, 5. e3027. pp. 1-30.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (13MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3027
 
56
1111


Abstract

Background. International trade for luxury products, medicines, and tonics poses a threat to both terrestrial and marine wildlife. The demand for and consumption of gill plates (known as Peng Yu Sai, "Fish Gill of Mobulid Ray") from devil and manta rays (subfamily Mobulinae, collectively referred to as mobulids) poses a significant threat to these marine fishes because of their extremely low productivity. The demand for these gill plates has driven an international trade supplied by largely unmonitored and unregulated catches from target, and incidental fisheries around the world. Scientific research, conservation campaigns, and legal protections for devil rays have lagged behind those for manta rays despite similar threats across all mobufids.

Methods. To investigate the difference in attention given to devil rays and manta rays, we examined trends in the scientific literature and updated species distribution maps for all mobufids. Using available information on target and incidental fisheries, and gathering information on fishing and trade regulations (at international, national, and territorial levels), we examined how threats and protective measures overlap with species distribution. We then used a species conservation planning approach to develop the Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy, specifying a vision, goals, objectives, and actions to advance the knowledge and protection of both devil and manta rays.

Results and Discussion. Our literature review revealed that there had been nearly 2.5-times more "manta"-titled publications, than "mobula" or "devil ray"-titled publications over the Past 4.5 years (January 2012 June 2016). The majority of these recent publications were reports on occurrence of mobulid species. These publications contributed to updated Area of Occupancy and Extent of Occurrence maps which showed expanded distributions for most mobulid species and overlap between the two genera. While several international protections have recently expanded to include all mobulids, there remains a greater number of national, state, and territory-level protections for manta rays compared to devil rays. We hypothesize that there are fewer scientific publications and regulatory protections for devil rays due primarily to perceptions of charisma that favour manta rays. We suggest that the well-established species conservation framework used here offers an objective solution to close this gap. To advance the goals of the conservation strategy we highlight opportunities for parity in protection and suggest solutions to help reduce target and by catch fisheries.

Item ID: 50377
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 2167-8359
Keywords: elasmobranch, conservation planning, Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), Extinction risk International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
Additional Information:

Copyright. 2017 Lawson et al. Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0.

Funders: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Canada Research Chairs Program, Save Our Seas Foundation (SOSF), Project AWARE foundation, WildAid, New England Aquarium, US State Department
Projects and Grants: SOSF #235 & 242
Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2017 08:23
FoR Codes: 30 AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES > 3005 Fisheries sciences > 300505 Fisheries management @ 40%
41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4104 Environmental management > 410401 Conservation and biodiversity @ 40%
31 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 3103 Ecology > 310305 Marine and estuarine ecology (incl. marine ichthyology) @ 20%
SEO Codes: 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9605 Ecosystem Assessment and Management > 960507 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Marine Environments @ 40%
96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960808 Marine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity @ 20%
83 ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS > 8302 Fisheries - Wild Caught > 830204 Wild Caught Fin Fish (excl. Tuna) @ 40%
Downloads: Total: 1111
Last 12 Months: 93
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page