Factors associated with James Cook University medical students experiencing "high quality" clinical learning on final-year rural placement
Mackie, Brooke, Woolley, Torres, Hollins, Aaron, and Hall, Leanne (2025) Factors associated with James Cook University medical students experiencing "high quality" clinical learning on final-year rural placement. Rural and Remote Health, 25 (2). 9395.
|
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (979kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: The James Cook University (JCU) medical school in Australia has a mission to produce graduates committed and competent to practise in local regional, rural and remote areas. As positive rural placement experiences are known to enhance interest in a rural career and generalist medicine, this study explores key factors contributing to JCU medical students having a ‘high quality’ rural clinical learning experience during their final-year rural placement.
Methods: This sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study included four focus groups (n=17) and a one-on-one interview followed by a cross-sectional survey (n=71; response rate=45%) of final-year JCU medical students in 2023. The main outcome variable for the survey was a visual analogue scale question asking students to rate the clinical learning environment on their rural placement, while an open-ended question asked if and how clinical learning received on placement differed depending upon the background training of their supervising doctor. In the focus groups, students were asked to identify on a circle diagram all key components that impacted on having a good or bad clinical learning experience on their placement, and then to explain individually and discuss as a group the contexts around each component.
Results: Overall, 46% of students completing the survey reported their rural placement was of high clinical learning value (≥85/100 on the visual analogue scale). Quantitative analysis identified ‘high value’ clinical learning placements were predicted by students spending >50% of their placement learning in EDs (p=0.005; prevalence odds ratio (POR) 9.4), having ‘very high’ confidence in knowing how to manage the common presentations of North Queensland patients (p=0.006; POR 8.5) and being placed in small towns more than 100 km from the populated North Queensland coast. Student focus group participants consistently reported they received the best teaching from local doctors who were more permanently based in that community, had significant experience in rural medicine, and were familiar with their competency level as a sixth-year student and their learning objectives on rural placement. Overall, the key areas impacting students’ clinical learning on rural placement can be summarized as ‘quality teaching/supervision’, ‘appropriate levels of autonomy’, ‘appropriate clinical variety and workload' and ‘student factors’.
Conclusion: The study findings suggest the key to JCU medical students having ‘high quality’ clinical learning on rural placements is by developing supportive learning relationships with senior, permanently based rural doctors who are willing to teach and know their scope of practice and specific placement learning requirements; and experiencing a diverse roster across hospital, GP and outreach clinics but with significant placement time in the ED. Potentially, these findings may assist rural placement programs coordinators to better plan, develop and support training sites and thus improve future placement experiences for student and junior doctor trainees. These improved learning experiences may in turn lead to more positive rural experiences that may further increase trainees’ interest in rural and/or generalist medicine careers.
Item ID: | 86186 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Research - C1) |
ISSN: | 1445-6354 |
Copyright Information: | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License. |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jul 2025 01:39 |
FoR Codes: | 39 EDUCATION > 3999 Other Education > 399999 Other education not elsewhere classified @ 70% 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4299 Other health sciences > 429999 Other health sciences not elsewhere classified @ 30% |
SEO Codes: | 16 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 1602 Schools and learning environments > 160299 Schools and learning environments not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
More Statistics |