Closing the compliance gap in marine protected areas with human behavioural sciences

Bergseth, Brock J., Arias, Adrian, Barnes, Michele L., Caldwell, Iain, Datta, Amber, Gelcich, Stefan, Ham, Sam H., Lau, Jacqueline D., Ruano-Chamorro, Cristina, Smallhorn-West, Patrick, Weekers, Damian, Zamborain-Mason, Jessica, and Cinner, Joshua E. (2023) Closing the compliance gap in marine protected areas with human behavioural sciences. Fish and Fisheries, 24. pp. 695-704.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12749
 
2
51


Abstract

Advocates, practitioners and policy-makers continue to use and advocate for marine protected areas (MPAs) to meet global ocean protection targets. Yet many of the worlds MPAs, and especially no-take MPAs, are plagued by poaching and ineffective governance. Using a global dataset on coral reefs as an example, we quantify the potential ecological gains of governing MPAs to increase compliance, which we call the ‘compliance gap’. Using ecological simulations based on model posteriors of joint Bayesian hierarchical models, we demonstrate how increased compliance in no-take MPAs could nearly double target fish biomass (91% increases in median fish biomass), and result in a 292% higher likelihood of encountering top predators. Achieving these gains and closing the compliance gap necessitates a substantial shift in approach and practice to go beyond optimizing enforcement, and towards governing for compliance. This will require engaging and integrating a broad suite of actors, principles, and practices across three key domains: (i)) harnessing social influence, (ii) integrating equity principles, and (iii) aligning incentives through market-based instruments. Empowering and shaping communication between actor groups (e.g., between fishers, practitioners, and policy-makers) using theoretically underpinned approaches from the behavioural sciences is one of the most essential, but often underserved aspects of governing MPAs. We therefore close by highlighting how this cross-cutting tool could be further integrated in governance to bolster high levels of compliance in MPAs.

Item ID: 79067
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1467-2979
Keywords: cognitive bias, framing, illegal fishing, persuasive communication, poaching, social influence
Copyright Information: © 2023 The Authors. Fish and Fisheries published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Funders: Australian Research Council (ARC)
Projects and Grants: DECRA DE210101924
Date Deposited: 20 Jun 2023 21:28
FoR Codes: 30 AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES > 3005 Fisheries sciences > 300505 Fisheries management @ 50%
52 PSYCHOLOGY > 5205 Social and personality psychology > 520505 Social psychology @ 25%
44 HUMAN SOCIETY > 4406 Human geography > 440699 Human geography not elsewhere classified @ 25%
SEO Codes: 18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1802 Coastal and estuarine systems and management > 180206 Rehabilitation or conservation of coastal or estuarine environments @ 50%
18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1802 Coastal and estuarine systems and management > 180201 Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystems @ 25%
28 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 2801 Expanding knowledge > 280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences @ 25%
Downloads: Total: 51
Last 12 Months: 31
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page