Costello, Christopher, Ovando, Daniel, Clavelle, Tyler, Kent Strauss, C., Hilborn, Ray, Melnychuk, Michael C., Branch, Trevor A., Gaines, Steven D., Szuwalski, Cody S., Cabral, Reniel B., Rader, Douglas N., and Leland, Amanda (2016) Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113 (18). pp. 5125-5129.

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only

 

435

4

Abstract

Data from 4,713 fisheries worldwide, representing 78% of global reported fish catch, are analyzed to estimate the status, trends, and benefits of alternative approaches to recovering depleted fisheries. For each fishery, we estimate current biological status and forecast the impacts of contrasting management regimes on catch, profit, and biomass of fish in the sea. We estimate unique recovery targets and trajectories for each fishery, calculate the year-by-year effects of alternative recovery approaches, and model how alternative institutional reforms affect recovery outcomes. Current status is highly heterogeneous—the median fishery is in poor health (overfished, with further overfishing occurring), although 32% of fisheries are in good biological, although not necessarily economic, condition. Our business-as-usual scenario projects further divergence and continued collapse for many of the world’s fisheries. Applying sound management reforms to global fisheries in our dataset could generate annual increases exceeding 16 million metric tons (MMT) in catch, $53 billion in profit, and 619 MMT in biomass relative to business as usual. We also find that, with appropriate reforms, recovery can happen quickly, with the median fishery taking under 10 y to reach recovery targets. Our results show that commonsense reforms to fishery management would dramatically improve overall fish abundance while increasing food security and profits.

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page