Hays, Richard B., Wilkinson, Tim, Green-Thompson, Lionel, McCrorie, Peter, Bollela, Valdes, Nadarajah, Vishna Devi, Anderson, M. Brownell, Norcini, John, Samarasekera, Dujeepa D., Boursicot, Katharine, Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S., Mandache, Madalina Elena, and Nadkar, Azhar Adam (2024) Managing assessment during curriculum change: Ottawa Consensus Statement. Medical Teacher, 46 (7). pp. 874-884.

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only

1

Abstract

Curriculum change is relatively frequent in health professional education. Formal, planned curriculum review must be conducted periodically to incorporate new knowledge and skills, changing teaching and learning methods or changing roles and expectations of graduates. Unplanned curriculum evolution arguably happens continually, usually taking the form of “minor” changes that in combination over time may produce a substantially different programme. However, reviewing assessment practices is less likely to be a major consideration during curriculum change, overlooking the potential for unintended consequences for learning. This includes potentially undermining or negating the impact of even well-designed and important curriculum changes. Changes to any component of the curriculum “ecosystem “- graduate outcomes, content, delivery or assessment of learning–should trigger an automatic review of the whole ecosystem to maintain constructive alignment. Consideration of potential impact on assessment is essential to support curriculum change. Powerful contextual drivers of a curriculum include national examinations and programme accreditation, so each assessment programme sits within its own external context. Internal drivers are also important, such as adoption of new learning technologies and learning preferences of students and faculty. Achieving optimal and sustainable outcomes from a curriculum review requires strong governance and support, stakeholder engagement, curriculum and assessment expertise and internal quality assurance processes. This consensus paper provides guidance on managing assessment during curriculum change, building on evidence and the contributions of previous consensus papers.

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page