Assessing research impact: Australian Research Council criteria and the case of Family Wellbeing research

Tsey, Komla, Onnis, Leigh-Ann, Whiteside, Mary, McCalman, Janya, Williams, Megan, Heyeres, Marion, Lui, Siu Man (Carrie), Klieve, Helen, Cadet-James, Yvonne, Baird, Leslie, Brown, Catherine, Watkin Lui, Felecia, Grainger, Daniel, Gabriel, Zona, Millgate, Nigel, Cheniart, Ben, Hunter, Tahalani, Liu, Hong-Bo, Yang, Yinghong, Yan, Li, Lovett, Ray, Chong, Alwin, and Kinchin, Irina (2019) Assessing research impact: Australian Research Council criteria and the case of Family Wellbeing research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73. pp. 176-186.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2...
 
1


Abstract

Researchers worldwide are increasingly reporting the societal impact of their research as part of national research productivity assessments. However, the challenges they encounter in developing their impact case studies against specified government assessment criteria and how pitfalls can be mitigated are not reported. This paper examines the key steps taken to develop an Aboriginal Family Wellbeing (FWB) empowerment research impact case study in the context of an Australian Research Council (ARC) pilot research impact assessment exercise and the challenges involved in applying the ARC criteria. The requirement that researchers demonstrate how their institutions support them to conduct impactful research has the potential to create supportive environments for researchers to be more responsive to the needs of users outside academia. However, the 15-year reference period for the associated research underpinning the reported impact and the focus on researcher's current institutional affiliation constitute potential constraints to demonstrating the true impact of research. For researchers working with Indigenous people, relationships that build over long periods of time, irrespective of university affiliation, are critical to conducting impactful research. A more open-ended time-frame, with no institutional restrictions for the 'associated research' provides the best opportunity to demonstrate the true benefits of research not only for Indigenous people but for Australian society more broadly.

Item ID: 57374
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1873-7870
Keywords: research, impact assessment, government criteria, challenges, case study, Aboriginal, Family Wellbeing
Copyright Information: © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Funders: Lowlitja Institute, Centre of Research Excellence: An Innovation Platform for Integrated Quality Improvement in Indigenous Primary Health Care (CRE-IQI)
Projects and Grants: Sustainable implementation of Indigenous early childhood family support programs that work: a Family Wellbeing case-study, CRE-IQI, funded by the NHMRC ID 1078927
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2019 03:21
FoR Codes: 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1117 Public Health and Health Services > 111701 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health @ 100%
SEO Codes: 92 HEALTH > 9203 Indigenous Health > 920303 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - Health System Performance (incl. Effectiveness of Interventions) @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 1
Last 12 Months: 1
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page