Fishery benefits and stakeholder priorities associated with a coral reef fishery and their implications for management

Hicks, Christina C., Stoeckl, Natalie, Cinner, Joshua E., and Robinson, Jan (2014) Fishery benefits and stakeholder priorities associated with a coral reef fishery and their implications for management. Environmental Science & Policy, 44. pp. 258-270.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website:


Fishers often behave in ways that were neither intended, nor anticipated, by managers or policy makers. This is in part because the factors that motivate and constrain behavior – people's preferences and their social characteristics – are overlooked. We used a case study of coral reef artisanal fishers in Seychelles to assess likely responses to different management approaches by identifying the benefits fishers associate with their coral reef environment, the extent to which they prioritize these benefits, and examining how these priorities relate to their social characteristics. We found that fishers identified a diversity of benefits associated with the fishery but overall fishery, option, bequest, and existence benefits were assigned the highest priorities. Fishers who prioritized fishery benefits, identified as "income", were different to the fishers who prioritized option and bequest benefits, identified as "a right of access for all" and "for our children" – differences that were also reflected in their social characteristics. Fishers who prioritized option and bequest benefits identified avenues to resolve conflicts and were more likely to take action when a norm was broken – characteristics thought to enable cooperation. There was a clear relationship between fishers' earnings and the extent to which they prioritized both fishery benefits and option benefits. Specifically, fishers with higher earnings tended to prioritize option whereas fishers with lower earnings tended to prioritize fishery benefits. These findings have important implications for fisheries management decision-making. For example, decentralized approaches, such as fisheries co-management, are only likely to succeed for the group of fishers who demonstrated a high likelihood of cooperation. Due to the relationship between earnings and fishers' priorities, management that influences fishers' earnings (e.g. through a tax), must consider the likely influence on fishers' priorities if it is to avoid unexpected or perverse outcomes.

Item ID: 33705
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1873-6416
Keywords: benefits; co-management; common pool resource system; decentralized; fisheries management; policy
Funders: Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA) , Rufford Foundation
Date Deposited: 02 Oct 2014 05:44
FoR Codes: 14 ECONOMICS > 1402 Applied Economics > 140205 Environment and Resource Economics @ 50%
05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050209 Natural Resource Management @ 50%
SEO Codes: 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9607 Environmental Policy, Legislation and Standards > 960701 Coastal and Marine Management Policy @ 50%
96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960808 Marine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity @ 50%
Downloads: Total: 4
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page