Evaluating River Monitoring Network Adequacy Using Remote Sensing, Biotic Indices, and Scenario Modelling

Canning, Adam (2026) Evaluating River Monitoring Network Adequacy Using Remote Sensing, Biotic Indices, and Scenario Modelling. Land, 15. 1970.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (17MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.3390/land15101970


Abstract

Freshwater monitoring networks are often biased toward major rivers and chemical indicators, creating blind spots in ecologically sensitive areas. This study tests whether a legacy monitoring network is positioned in the right parts of its catchment, using three lines of evidence independent of the chemical record, remote sensing to look back, biological indices to assess the present, and catchment modelling to look forward, applied to the Rangitīkei catchment, New Zealand. NDVI, NDBSI, and water quality trends were assessed with a Bayesian change-point method; a catchment-wide macroinvertebrate survey extended coverage beyond routine sites; and the InVEST Nutrient Delivery Ratio model, calibrated against measured nitrogen loads, simulated land use change scenarios. Neither remote sensing nor water quality indicated widespread deterioration, with no directional trends detected in either. Macroinvertebrate surveys identified severely degraded sites outside the existing network, including two below the national bottom line in a single survey. Converting suitable land to dairy farming predicted nitrogen export increases of up to 110% at the most exposed site, and cropping conversion up to 69%. Riparian buffers combined with a 20% reduction in nitrogen loss from high-producing grassland predicted reductions of up to 32%. Sites with the greatest predicted risk, primarily Tutaenui Stream and Kawhatau River, are not well covered by the existing network. Network design methods are largely built around statistical representativeness or accessibility rather than catchment process. This framework identified priority gaps such designs would likely miss, offering a transferable basis for auditing networks or informing new ones.

Item ID: 94537
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 2073-445X
Keywords: water quality; remote sensing; catchment management; monitoring network design; macroinvertebrate bioassessment; adaptive management; eutrophication; agricultural land use
Copyright Information: © 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Date Deposited: 03 Nov 2026 02:27
FoR Codes: 41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4104 Environmental management > 410404 Environmental management @ 100%
SEO Codes: 18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1803 Fresh, ground and surface water systems and management > 180301 Assessment and management of freshwater ecosystems @ 50%
18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1803 Fresh, ground and surface water systems and management > 180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversity @ 50%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page