Mishra, Anjalis, Rai, Shashi Kant, Farooq, Syed, and Mishra, Amrit Kumar (2026) Long-Term Expansion, Ecosystem Services and Management Trade-Offs of Phragmites karka in Asia's Largest Lagoon. Aquatic Conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems, 36. e70469.

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (12MB) | Preview

Abstract

Coastal lagoons are increasingly altered by hydrological modification and catchment-derived nutrient loading, driving shifts in macrophyte dominance and creating complex management trade-offs. In Chilika lagoon, India, the emergent macrophyte Phragmites karka has expanded, raising concerns about impacts on native macrophytes, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity. We integrated Landsat imagery (1991–2025) with field measurements of water quality, sediment biogeochemistry, metal accumulation and population demography to evaluate its expansion implications. P. karka exhibited alternating phases of expansion and contraction, and occupied approximately 8611.21 ha in 2025. Established stands occurred under low-salinity, and reducing conditions, and contained sediment carbon and nitrogen stocks of 50.09 ± 18.11 Mg C ha−1 and 4.81 ± 1.60 Mg N ha−1, corresponding to approximately 0.43 million Mg C and 41,420 Mg N across the extent. Metals were below-detection limits in surface waters but accumulated in sediments and plant tissues, with biota-sediment accumulation factors > 1 for Mn, Ni and Co. Population demography indicated recruitment and positive growth, suggesting persistence under prevailing conditions. These findings document habitat-specific biogeochemical attributes, but do not imply that they outweigh biodiversity concerns, establish conservation equivalence with native habitats or alter the invasive status of P. karka. Management should remain site-specific: restoration, nutrient-source reduction, hydrological rehabilitation, containment and removal should be prioritized where native-community recovery is feasible or sensitive habitats are threatened. Monitored temporary retention may be considered only where restoration is constrained, risks to sensitive habitats and native communities are low and rapid removal could mobilize sediments, nutrients or contaminants. Decisions should remain conditional, reversible and periodically reassessed.

Item ID:	94078
Item Type:	Article (Research - C1)
ISSN:	1099-0755
Keywords:	bioindicators, blue carbon, blue nitrogen, climate change, population demography
Copyright Information:	This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non- commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. © 2026 The Author(s). Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Date Deposited:	07 Oct 2026 02:00
FoR Codes:	41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4102 Ecological applications > 410204 Ecosystem services (incl. pollination) @ 100%
SEO Codes:	18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1802 Coastal and estuarine systems and management > 180203 Coastal or estuarine biodiversity @ 100%
	More Statistics