Leite de Almeida, Ana Carla, Dale, Allan, Hay, Rachel, Everingham, Yvette, and Lockie, Stewart (2026) Reframing biodiversity markets for sustainable agriculture: a systematic review and governance framework for effective nature-positive outcomes. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology. (In Press)

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

Biodiversity markets are gaining global attention as innovative mechanisms to mobilise private finance for conservation and support nature-positive transitions in sectors such as agriculture. Yet, empirical evidence on their design, effectiveness, and governance remains fragmented. This study presents a systematic review of biodiversity market literature, combining PRISMA-based screening of 671 peer-reviewed articles with bibliometric mapping and thematic synthesis. The review focuses on peer-reviewed studies with accessible full texts, which may have excluded some relevant literature. We traced the evolution of biodiversity market discourse beyond offsets to emerging credit systems, stacked financing models, and nature-positive outcome frameworks. The analysis reveals major challenges, including the absence of robust ecological metrics, inconsistent governance arrangements, and limited attention to equity in market design. It also highlights mounting concerns, raised across the literature, about greenwashing and the credibility of market-based claims. Without robust design and transparent oversight, biodiversity markets risk undermining conservation goals and public trust. Our findings underscore the urgent need for more rigorous, transparent, and evidence-based approaches to ensure biodiversity finance mechanisms deliver real, measurable ecological outcomes. In response, we propose a five-pillar governance framework to guide future biodiversity market development: (1) policy and institutional anchoring, (2) inclusive governance, (3) scientific and ecological integrity, (4) fit-for-purpose financial mechanisms, and (5) place-based implementation. This framework offers practical guidance for designing credible, equitable biodiversity markets that support long-term stewardship and sustainable land use.

Item ID:	93675
Item Type:	Article (Research - C1)
ISSN:	1745-2627
Keywords:	Transition Finance, Natural Capital, Stacked Credits, Blended Finance, Ecological Metrics, Biodiversity Finance
Copyright Information:	© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Funders:	Australian Government’s Future Drought Fund
Projects and Grants:	Tropical North Queensland Drought Hub
Date Deposited:	02 Sep 2026 00:58
FoR Codes:	30 AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES > 3002 Agriculture, land and farm management > 300202 Agricultural land management @ 20% 35 COMMERCE, MANAGEMENT, TOURISM AND SERVICES > 3502 Banking, finance and investment > 350201 Environment and climate finance @ 50% 41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4104 Environmental management > 410406 Natural resource management @ 30%
SEO Codes:	18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1806 Terrestrial systems and management > 180606 Terrestrial biodiversity @ 100%
	More Statistics