Agricultural practices for cleaner water: a global synthesis of meta-evidence

Canning, Adam D. (2026) Agricultural practices for cleaner water: a global synthesis of meta-evidence. Environmental Reviews, 34.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2025-0263


Abstract

Agricultural intensification has pushed nitrogen and phosphorus cycles beyond safe planetary limits, with agriculture now a primary driver of at least two Earth system boundaries being breached. Technological fixes alone are unlikely to resolve this: efficiency gains tend to lower production costs and drive further expansion (known as Jevon’s Paradox), intensifying environmental pressure rather than relieving it. Reducing agricultural water pollution will therefore require a shift toward production systems that work with ecological processes rather than against them. Despite growing interest in agroecological and regenerative approaches, evidence on their effectiveness for improving water quality remains fragmented across practices, regions, and study designs. This review of review synthesizes global evidence from 67 multi-continental meta-analyses on how farm practices affect nutrient, pesticide, and sediment losses. Nonlegume cover crops cut nitrate leaching by about 50%–70% and sediment by 50%–60%. Residue retention and organic amendments reduced runoff nutrients by 25%–50% and sediment by up to 75%. Reduced tillage lowered sediment losses by about 60% but often increased nitrate leaching, highlighting the importance of complementary fertilizer management. Optimizing fertilizer rates, timing, and formulation, alongside precision irrigation, reduced nitrogen losses by 20%–70%. At the landscape scale, vegetated buffers, agroforestry, and wetlands typically removed 25%–90% of nutrients and 40%–95% of sediment. Improving soil cover, structure, and hydrological function can sharply reduce pollution without sacrificing yields, showing that poor water quality stems from management, not inevitability. However, important evidence gaps remain: pesticide transport lacks any global synthesis despite residues being among the most pervasive agricultural contaminants, quantitative evidence on adaptive grazing management remains limited, and most underlying studies are concentrated in temperate croplands of North America, Europe, and China, limiting confidence in applying these findings to tropical, arid, or smallholder systems.

Item ID: 92353
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1208-6053
Keywords: water quality, farming, food production, regenerative agriculture, agroecological practices, nutrient loss
Copyright Information: © 2026 The Author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Date Deposited: 16 Jun 2026 02:23
FoR Codes: 30 AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES > 3002 Agriculture, land and farm management > 300210 Sustainable agricultural development @ 60%
41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4105 Pollution and contamination > 410504 Surface water quality processes and contaminated sediment assessment @ 40%
SEO Codes: 18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1803 Fresh, ground and surface water systems and management > 180301 Assessment and management of freshwater ecosystems @ 50%
18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1803 Fresh, ground and surface water systems and management > 180307 Rehabilitation or conservation of fresh, ground and surface water environments @ 50%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page