Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs on surgical site infection and 30-day readmission in patients undergoing gastro-intestinal procedures: An umbrella review

Gillespie, Brigid M., Tobiano, Georgia, Lovegrove, Josephine, Sugathapala, R.D. Udeshika Priyadarshani, Thalib, Lukman, Walker, Rachel, Erickson, Annette, Carlini, Joan, Thong, Stanley, Addy, Keith, Spencer, Melinda, and Chaboyer, Wendy (2026) Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs on surgical site infection and 30-day readmission in patients undergoing gastro-intestinal procedures: An umbrella review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 175. 105315.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025....


Abstract

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs have been implemented across surgical specialties; however, their effectiveness in reducing surgical site infection and 30-day hospital readmission remains unclear.

Objective: To determine the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs on the clinical outcomes of surgical site infection and readmission and identify items of and implementation strategies for such programs.

Design: An umbrella review of published systematic reviews.

Methods: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were conducted in January 2025. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions comparing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs with standard care in adults after major open or laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, focusing on surgical site infection and 30-day hospital readmission, were included. Review quality and certainty of evidence were assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tools.

Results: 49 reviews were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis of 42 unique primary randomised controlled trials with 5112 patients suggests a significant association between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs use and surgical site infection reduction (estimated odds ratio 0.70, 95 % confidence interval 0.59–0.82, p <0.001, I2 =0 %). Meta-analysis of 53 primary randomised controlled trials with 7360 patients suggests no significant relationship between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs and hospital readmission (estimated odds ratio 1.025, 95 % confidence interval 0.85–1.23, p =0.792, I2 =0 %). Summary estimates for surgical site infection were similar across non-randomised studies of interventions. GRADE assessments suggest ‘very low’ certainty across outcomes. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs included 5 to 28 components; implementation strategies were not described. Discussion: Results suggest an association between Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs and reductions in surgical site infection, and no relationship between hospital readmissions. However, the body of evidence is weak and inconclusive. These results also indicate heterogeneity in compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, reflecting the complexity in standardising this surgical care pathway.

Conclusions: Well-controlled primary research is warranted to understand the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs.

Item ID: 91119
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1873-491X
Keywords: Gastro-intestinal surgery Readmission Surgical site infection
Related URLs:
Copyright Information: © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2026 01:54
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page