More, Sagar, Milne, William, Tuladhar, Rabin, and UNSPECIFIED (2025) Multi-stage quantitative risk assessment of a critical system in mining industry. Maintenance, Reliability and Condition Monitoring, 5 (2). pp. 172-195.

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only

Abstract

Engineering Asset Management (EAM) is a strategic approach focused on the optimal management of physical assets throughout their lifecycle. By integrating engineering principles with financial and operational strategies, EAM aims to enhance asset performance, reliability, and longevity while minimizing risks and costs. This holistic methodology ensures that machinery, equipment, and infrastructure operate efficiently, thereby reducing failures and maximizing productivity. A critical component of EAM is understanding the criticality of each asset within a system. Criticality analysis evaluates the potential impact of different failure modes, considering factors such as failure likelihood, consequences, system interdependencies, cost implications, and associated risks. This analysis is essential for prioritizing maintenance efforts and allocating resources effectively. Risk assessment plays a pivotal role in this context, involving the systematic identification, analysis, evaluation, and management of potential risks associated with asset failures. However, traditional risk assessment methods often face challenges due to subjectivity and variability in evaluations, which can lead to inconsistencies in maintenance decision-making. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel multi-stage quantitative Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) framework. This approach systematically analyses failure rates, downtime, and cost implications, providing a comprehensive understanding of each failure mode's impact. By integrating these quantitative parameters, the framework enhances objectivity in risk assessment and supports more informed decision-making. It enables organisations to systematically prioritize maintenance activities and optimize resource allocation. This approach not only mitigates operational risks but also aligns asset management practices with overarching business objectives, leading to improved efficiency and reduced costs. The proposed methodology is particularly beneficial in industries such as mining, manufacturing, and aerospace, where unplanned downtime and maintenance costs can have significant operational and financial repercussions. By adopting this multi-dimensional approach, organizations can improve asset performance, enhance safety, and achieve more sustainable operations.

Item ID:	90216
Item Type:	Article (Research - C1)
ISSN:	2669-2961
Date Deposited:	03 Feb 2026 00:32
FoR Codes:	40 ENGINEERING > 4010 Engineering practice and education > 401005 Risk engineering @ 100%
SEO Codes:	17 ENERGY > 1706 Mining and extraction of energy resources > 170699 Mining and extraction of energy resources not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads:	Total: 3 Last 12 Months: 3
	More Statistics