O'Sullivan, Carmel (2022) New Court, Same Division: The Bemba Case as an Illustration of the Continued Confusion regarding the Command Responsibility Doctrine. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35 (3). pp. 661-678.

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (202kB) | Preview

Abstract

Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo was the International Criminal Court’s first case directly addressing the command responsibility doctrine. As the first permanent international criminal court who can exercise jurisdiction over a majority of the world’s nation states, its interpretation of the doctrine was potentially an important development in international criminal law and an opportunity to affirm the legal responsibility of commanders for their subordinates’ crimes. However, rather than providing a clear articulation of the doctrine and its scope, the Appeals Chamber was split. By a 3–2 majority, it reversed the Trial Chamber’s decision and the Appeals Chamber’s judges were sufficiently divided in their reasoning that they felt compelled to deliver separate opinions.

A key disagreement within the doctrine is whether command responsibility is a mode of liability or a separate offence of dereliction of duty. This disagreement feeds into further contestation about the doctrine’s core elements, including the standard of fault necessary under its actus reus or mens rea elements. This article examines the judges’ reasoning in Bemba to illustrate that, despite decades of jurisprudence and academic debate, there is still confusion on these foundational elements. Instead of being ‘settled law’, the debate on command responsibility is still live. The article maintains that the current law supports a mode of liability interpretation but proposes that reclassifying the doctrine as a separate offence could resolve many of its tensions while observing the culpability principle, satisfying its justifications, and facilitating an adequately wide scope of accountability.

Item ID:	89034
Item Type:	Article (Research - C1)
ISSN:	1478-9698
Copyright Information:	© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law in association with the Grotius Centre for International Law, Leiden University. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Date Deposited:	23 Oct 2025 00:30
FoR Codes:	48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 4803 International and comparative law > 480306 International criminal law @ 100%
SEO Codes:	23 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 2304 Justice and the law > 230403 Criminal justice @ 100%
	More Statistics