Parent Attitudes to Research Without Prior Consent in Two Pediatric Emergency Clinical Trials in Australia: A Qualitative Study of Transcripts From 2017

Furyk, Jeremy S., Mcbain-Rigg, Kristin, George, Shane, Phillips, Natalie, Craig, Simon, Franklin, Donna, Watt, Kerrianne, Wilson, Catherine, Borland, Meredith L., Franklin, Richard, Dalziel, Stuart R., Schibler, Andreas, and Babl, Franz (2025) Parent Attitudes to Research Without Prior Consent in Two Pediatric Emergency Clinical Trials in Australia: A Qualitative Study of Transcripts From 2017. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 26 (5). e718-e727.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.000000000000...
2


Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Research in critically ill children poses challenges in acquiring prospective informed consent. International ethical guidelines generally have provisions to perform research without prior consent (RWPC) in circumstances where consent is not feasible, but there is a paucity of data regarding the community acceptance of this process. The objectives of the current study were to explore the attitudes and experiences of parents of children enrolled into trials to determine understanding and acceptability of RWPC to parents of children involved. DESIGN: Qualitative study of semi-structured telephone interviews in 2017 exploring themes of medical research, trial participation in RWPC. Interview transcripts underwent inductive thematic analysis with intercoder agreement, using Nvivo 14 software. SETTING: Two clinical interventional trials in Australia conducted in critically ill children without prospective consent. SUBJECTS: Parents of children enrolled in critical care research. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 49 interviews were conducted and analyzed. Parents of participants were supportive of processes used in the trials and RWPC. Paperwork was often not thought to contribute to improved understanding, with verbal information more valued. There was no consensus on the optimal approach of RWPC in situations when clinical outcome was poor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study in 2017 shows that parent/carer supported RWPC in two pediatric trials involving critically ill children. Parents were satisfied with existing approval methods and safeguards. Parents valued brief verbal information at the time of randomization. These historical findings support the feasibility of conducting research on time-sensitive interventions in emergency settings with RWPC, aligning with community expectations.

Item ID: 88113
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1947-3893
Keywords: child, critical care, ethics, informed consent, medical, research design
Copyright Information: Copyright © 2025 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Funders: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Projects and Grants: NHMRC GNT1058560, NHMRC GNT1081736
Date Deposited: 24 Mar 2026 03:32
FoR Codes: 32 BIOMEDICAL AND CLINICAL SCIENCES > 3213 Paediatrics > 321302 Infant and child health @ 100%
SEO Codes: 20 HEALTH > 2001 Clinical health > 200105 Treatment of human diseases and conditions @ 100%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page