Researchers’ perceptions of the trustworthiness, for reuse purposes, of government health data in Victoria, Australia: Implications for policy and practice
Riley, Merilyn, Kilkenny, Monique F., Robinson, Kerin, and Leggat, Sandra G. (2025) Researchers’ perceptions of the trustworthiness, for reuse purposes, of government health data in Victoria, Australia: Implications for policy and practice. Health Information Management Journal, 54 (2). pp. 139-149.
|
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 2022 the Australian Data Availability and Transparency Act (DATA) commenced, enabling accredited “data users” to access data from “accredited data service providers.” However, the DATA Scheme lacks guidance on “trustworthiness” of the data to be utilised for reuse purposes. Objectives: To determine: (i) Do researchers using government health datasets trust the data? (ii) What factors influence their perceptions of data trustworthiness? and (iii) What are the implications for government and data custodians? Method: Authors of published studies (2008–2020) that utilised Victorian government health datasets were surveyed via a case study approach. Twenty-eight trust constructs (identified via literature review) were grouped into data factors, management properties and provider factors. Results: Fifty experienced health researchers responded. Most (88%) believed that Victorian government health data were trustworthy. When grouped, data factors and management properties were more important than data provider factors in building trust. The most important individual trust constructs were: “compliant with ethical regulation” (100%) and “monitoring privacy and confidentiality” (98%). Constructs of least importance were knowledge of “participant consent” (56%) and “major focus of the data provider was research” (50%). Conclusion: Overall, the researchers trusted government health data, but data factors and data management properties were more important than data provider factors in building trust. Implications: Government should ensure the DATA Scheme incorporates mechanisms to validate those data utilised by accredited data users and data providers have sufficient quality (intrinsic and extrinsic) to meet the requirements of “trustworthiness,” and that evidentiary documentation is provided to support these “accredited data.”
| Item ID: | 88084 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Research - C1) |
| ISSN: | 1833-3575 |
| Keywords: | data analysis, data curation, data quality, data reuse, data sharing, Data trust, government, health information management, secondary data |
| Copyright Information: | © The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Request permissions for this article. |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2026 04:37 |
| FoR Codes: | 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4203 Health services and systems > 420308 Health informatics and information systems @ 100% |
| SEO Codes: | 20 HEALTH > 2002 Evaluation of health and support services > 200206 Health system performance (incl. effectiveness of programs) @ 100% |
| More Statistics |
