Yarning for peer review
Schultz, Clinton, Oguoma, Victor, Pengilly, Justyce, and Kuipers, Pim (2024) Yarning for peer review. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 32 (3). pp. 417-418.
|
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
Abstract
[Extract] The Editorial Board of the AJRH, as with the leadership of many other academic journals, is committed to decolonising, strengthening and showcasing Indigenous health research. We are committed not only to high academic standards, but also to act (and to be seen to act) with integrity and sensitivity. Recently, the AJRH has played a key role in charting ways of ensuring Indigenous authors are appropriately acknowledged.1 We are currently exploring new ways of providing sustainable Indigenous oversight of the editorial process of manuscripts pertaining to First Nations people and health services. Our emerging challenge is how to ensure academic rigour and translational relevance, while ensuring culturally safe and optimal practices.
| Item ID: | 87260 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Editorial) |
| ISSN: | 1440-1584 |
| Copyright Information: | © 2024 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Nov 2025 23:39 |
| FoR Codes: | 45 INDIGENOUS STUDIES > 4504 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and wellbeing > 450499 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and wellbeing not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
| SEO Codes: | 21 INDIGENOUS > 2103 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health > 210399 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
| More Statistics |
