Enteric methane production of low-quality forage-fed dairy cattle with different genetic merit
Munidasa, J.N.K.K.S.H., Cullen, B.R., Eckard, R.J., Talukder, S., and Cheng, L. (2021) Enteric methane production of low-quality forage-fed dairy cattle with different genetic merit. In: Animal Production in Australia: proceedings of the 33rd Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Sciences (33) From: 33rd Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Sciences, 1-3 February 2021, Fremantle, WA, Australia.
![]() |
PDF (Abstract Only)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
Abstract
As a by-product of enteric fermentation, dairy cattle emit methane (CH4) which is a greenhouse gas. Thus, reducing enteric CH4 emission will become an essential trait for future breeding objectives in dairy cattle production, along with other production traits, for achieving sustainable dairy businesses (Hayes Lewin & Goddard, 2013). The objective of this study was to explore the enteric CH4 emission difference of dairy cattle selected under current breeding systems in Australia and New Zealand. Datasets from two separate experiments comparing production and intake of dairy cattle fed on low-quality forage were used to estimate enteric CH4 production in this study. Experiment 1 was conducted in New Zealand using high breeding worth (HBW = 198) vs. low breeding worth (LBW = 57) Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Eight cows were used in each group and they were compared through indoor feeding of pasture for five days in a nitrogen balance study as described in Cheng et al. (2014). Experiment 2 dataset was obtained from an unpublished dairy heifer experiment conducted at Dookie College, Australia. In this study, 48 Holstein-Friesian heifers with known Balanced Performance Index (BPI) were grouped into high (HBPI = 125; n = 6) and low (LBPI = 22; n = 6) genetic groups, allowed to graze for 29 days to measure pasture intake and weight gain. Dry matter intake (DMI) of the animal were computed using the grazed area, differences between pre- and post- grazing pasture mass and rate of the pasture regrowth. Metabolizable energy and crude protein contents of forage used in experiment 1 were 9.9 MJ/kg dry matter (DM) and 15.2% on DM basis, respectively and those values in experiment 2 were 9.3 MJ/kg DM and 5.9% on DM basis, respectively. Milk yield was corrected to 4 % fat corrected milk (FCM) using an equation published by Gaines and Davidson (1923): FMC = milk yield (0.4 + 0.15 fat %). The amount of enteric CH4 production was estimated using the equation published by Charmley et al. (2016): CH4 production (g/day) = 20.7 DMI (kg/day). Methane production of each cattle was divided by FCM production (cows) or average daily gain (ADG for heifer) to estimate the CH4 emission intensity (EI) per unit of production. The data were analysed using one-way ANOVA (Genstat). In experiment 1 HBW cows produced more CH4 compared to LBW cows (P<0.05; Table1) as their levels of DMI were higher (P<0.05; Table1). However, heifer groups in experiment 2 were not different from each other in terms of CH4 production and DMI (P>0.05; Table 1). Notably, the calculation of CH4 EI in experiment 1 showed a higher level in LBW cows compared to HBW cows (P<0.05; Table1). The calculation of CH4 EI for experiment 2 showed no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05; Table 1). This study demonstrated that current breeding system of the New Zealand farm has reduced the CH4 EI in lactating cows and the result of experiment 2 showed that current breeding system in the Australian farm has not reduced the CH4 EI of heifers in terms of ADG. This preliminary research should be explored further using a larger population of cattle.
Item ID: | 86208 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Conference Item (Abstract / Summary) |
ISSN: | 728-5965 |
Copyright Information: | Articles submitted for Animal Production 2021 remain the copyright of the author, but authors by virtue of submission agree to grant the Australian Association of Animal Sciences liberty to permanently display the article online for public viewing as part of this Animal Production in Australia Proceedings of the 33rd Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Animal Sciences. |
Date Deposited: | 24 Jul 2025 01:34 |
FoR Codes: | 30 AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES > 3003 Animal production > 300303 Animal nutrition @ 100% |
SEO Codes: | 10 ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS > 1099 Other animal production and animal primary products > 109999 Other animal production and animal primary products not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
Downloads: |
Total: 2 Last 12 Months: 2 |
More Statistics |