Barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening participation in remote Tasmania: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework

Gadd, Nicola, Lee, Simone, Hughes, Jessica, Sharman, Matthew J., Hoang, Ha, and Obamiro, Kehinde (2024) Barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening participation in remote Tasmania: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 32 (5). pp. 1041-1053.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (788kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13181


Abstract

Objective: Identify barriers and enablers for remote Tasmanians participating in bowel cancer screening through the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.

Setting: A small remote Tasmanian community.

Participants: Tasmanian remote community members aged 50 years and over.

Design: A qualitative study conducted 16 semi-structured interviews. Two researchers conducted in-person and telephone interviews. Questions were directed by an interview guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework for behaviour change and Behaviour Change Wheel. Two researchers analysed data using directed content analysis with a flexible inductive approach.

Results: Four themes related to barriers and enablers to completing the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program screening kit in remote Tasmania. Themes included the subject of screening, physical screening kit, the process and outcome of the kit. Several barrier and enabler sub-themes overlapped or were linked, as many enablers mitigated barriers. For example, social influences, awareness level, steps in completing screening, and planning and timing to screen. Social support and discussing screening with others were key enablers, whereas lack of these were barriers. For remote communities, taking the kit to the post office was a barrier from often knowing the post officer. A bowel bus providing screening and information support services may reduce the travel burden of follow-up diagnostic tests and support low-literacy individuals to screen.

Conclusion: Barriers and enablers exist within each stage of the screening process, from what influences an individual decision to screen, through to the outcome. To improve screening rates in rural/remote Tasmania, barriers and enablers to screening must be considered.

Item ID: 85346
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1440-1584
Copyright Information: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2024 The Author(s). Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.
Date Deposited: 06 May 2025 01:27
FoR Codes: 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4206 Public health > 420605 Preventative health care @ 50%
42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4203 Health services and systems > 420321 Rural and remote health services @ 50%
SEO Codes: 20 HEALTH > 2005 Specific population health (excl. Indigenous health) > 200508 Rural and remote area health @ 50%
20 HEALTH > 2002 Evaluation of health and support services > 200204 Health inequalities @ 50%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page