A dual-angle exploration towards understanding lapses in COVID-19 social responsibility

Lee, Sean T.H., Mah, Jerome J.X., and Leung, Angela K.-y. (2024) A dual-angle exploration towards understanding lapses in COVID-19 social responsibility. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. (In Press)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Publisher Accepted Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (516kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12605
 
175


Abstract

Breaking infection chains requires not just behaviours that allow individuals to stay healthy and uninfected (i.e. health protective behaviours) but also for those who are possibly infected to protect others from their harboured infection risk (i.e. socially responsible behaviours). However, socially responsible behaviours entail costs without clear, immediate benefits to the individual, such that public health-risking lapses occur from time to time. In this important yet understudied area, the current exploratory study sought to identify possible psychological factors that may affect people's likelihood of engaging in socially responsible behaviours. Assuming that self-perceived infection should provide an impetus to engage in socially responsible behaviours, we contend that lapses could occur in two scenarios: discounting of possible infection or prioritizing self-interest over collective good. Through a vignette portraying COVID-19 relevant symptoms presented to culturally diverse participants (Singapore and United States; N = 645), we found dispositional denialism (an ego defence mechanism) to exert a negative indirect effect on likelihood of engaging in socially responsible behaviours through its negative association with perceived infection status. Further, social value orientation and cultural orientation appeared to significantly moderate the positive association between perceived infection status and the likelihood of engaging in socially responsible behaviours, such that the positive association held only when individuals espouse both a prosocial value orientation and a collectivistic cultural orientation. Further analyses also point toward a possible attenuation of this positive association when individuals espouse a vertical cultural orientation. Future directions and implications for public health management are discussed.

Item ID: 82561
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1467-839X
Keywords: COVID-19, cultural differences, denialism, optimistic bias, public health, socially responsible behaviours
Copyright Information: © 2024 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Date Deposited: 01 May 2024 23:27
FoR Codes: 52 PSYCHOLOGY > 5203 Clinical and health psychology > 520304 Health psychology @ 40%
42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4206 Public health > 420699 Public health not elsewhere classified @ 40%
52 PSYCHOLOGY > 5205 Social and personality psychology > 520503 Personality and individual differences @ 20%
SEO Codes: 20 HEALTH > 2004 Public health (excl. specific population health) > 200401 Behaviour and health @ 50%
13 CULTURE AND SOCIETY > 1399 Other culture and society > 139999 Other culture and society not elsewhere classified @ 30%
28 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 2801 Expanding knowledge > 280121 Expanding knowledge in psychology @ 20%
Downloads: Total: 175
Last 12 Months: 175
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page