Sims, Rebecca, Michaleff, Zoe A., Glasziou, Paul, Jones, Mark, and Thomas, Rae (2023) Quantifying the psychological and behavioural consequences of a diagnostic label for non-cancer conditions: systematic review. BJPsych Open, 9 (3). e73.

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (659kB) | Preview

 

19

Abstract

Background Screening for asymptomatic health conditions is perceived as mostly beneficial, with possible harms receiving little attention.

Aims To quantify proximal and longer-term consequences for individuals receiving a diagnostic label following screening for an asymptomatic, non-cancer health condition.

Method Five electronic databases were searched (inception to November 2022) for studies that recruited asymptomatic screened individuals who received or did not receive a diagnostic label. Eligible studies reported psychological, psychosocial and/or behavioural outcomes before and after screening results. Independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, extracted data from included studies, and assessed risk of bias (Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions). Results were meta-analysed or descriptively reported.

Results Sixteen studies were included. Twelve studies addressed psychological outcomes, four studies examined behavioural outcomes and none reported psychosocial outcomes. Risk of bias was judged as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 5) or serious (n = 3). Immediately after receiving results, anxiety was significantly higher for individuals receiving versus not receiving a diagnostic label (mean difference -7.28, 95% CI -12.85 to -1.71). On average, anxiety increased from the non-clinical to clinical range, but returned to the non-clinical range in the longer term. No significant immediate or longer-term differences were found for depression or general mental health. Absenteeism did not significantly differ from the year before to the year after screening.

Conclusions The impacts of screening asymptomatic, non-cancer health conditions are not universally positive. Limited research exists regarding longer-term impacts. Well-designed, high-quality studies further investigating these impacts are required to assist development of protocols that minimise psychological distress following diagnosis.

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page