Allen, Jyai, Creedy, Debra, Mills, Kyly, and Gamble, Jenny (2023) Health engagement: a systematic review of tools modifiable for use with vulnerable pregnant women. BMJ Open, 13 (3). e065720.

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective To examine available health engagement tools suitable to, or modifiable for, vulnerable pregnant populations.

Design Systematic review.

Eligibility criteria Original studies of tool development and validation related to health engagement, with abstract available in English, published between 2000 and 2022, sampling people receiving outpatient healthcare including pregnant women.

Data sources CINAHL Complete, Medline, EMBASE and PubMed were searched in April 2022.

Risk of bias Study quality was independently assessed by two reviewers using an adapted COSMIN risk of bias quality appraisal checklist. Tools were also mapped against the Synergistic Health Engagement model, which centres on women’s buy- in to maternity care.

Included studies Nineteen studies were included from Canada, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK and the USA. Four tools were used with pregnant populations, two tools with vulnerable non- pregnant populations, six tools measured patient–provider relationship, four measured patient activation, and three tools measured both relationship and activation.

Results Tools that measured engagement in maternity care assessed some of the following constructs: communication or information sharing, woman- centred care, health guidance, shared decision- making, sufficient time, availability, provider attributes, discriminatory or respectful care. None of the maternity engagement tools assessed the key construct of buy- in. While non- maternity health engagement tools measured some elements of buy- in (self- care, feeling hopeful about treatment), other elements (disclosing risks to healthcare providers and acting on health advice), which are significant for vulnerable populations, were rarely measured.

Conclusions and implications Health engagement is hypothesised as the mechanism by which midwifery- led care reduces the risk of perinatal morbidity for vulnerable women. To test this hypothesis, a new assessment tool is required that addresses all the relevant constructs of the Synergistic Health Engagement model, developed for and psychometrically assessed in the target group.

Item ID:	81607
Item Type:	Article (Research - C1)
ISSN:	2044-6055
Copyright Information:	© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Date Deposited:	23 Jan 2024 02:51
FoR Codes:	42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4204 Midwifery > 420499 Midwifery not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes:	20 HEALTH > 2003 Provision of health and support services > 200306 Midwifery @ 50% 20 HEALTH > 2005 Specific population health (excl. Indigenous health) > 200509 Women's and maternal health @ 25% 20 HEALTH > 2002 Evaluation of health and support services > 200204 Health inequalities @ 25%
Downloads:	Total: 7 Last 12 Months: 7
	More Statistics