Design for All – Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry?

Paul, Gunther, Steffan, Isabella Tiziana, Itoh, Nana, Bowman, Richard, and Bradtmiller, Bruce (2022) Design for All – Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry? Work, 73 (s1). S57-S65.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211106
 
1
2


Abstract

Background: Design for All or Universal Design is a relatively new domain in Ergonomics. With globally ageing populations, it has however recently gained significant interest.

Objective: This position paper summarizes the outcomes of a workshop held at the virtual 21st Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. The paper expands the horizon of traditional Ergonomics into a domain where people are differently abled and establishes a platform for the essential needs of future ergonomic standards which are required to inform inclusive design guidelines, or Design for All, extending the range of users.

Methods: The paper includes contributions from Asian, Australian, European and US workshop participants who are accessibility design experts in their respective geographic regions. The paper summarizes issues related to anthropometry in the Design for All, based on recent work in the US (Access board) and actual developments in various national and international accessibility standardization bodies, such as the Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, the European Standardization Organization (EN 17210:2021; EN 17161:2019) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 21542:2021 and BS ISO 7176-5:2008).

Conclusions: The paper concludes that despite the identification of a significant gap in knowledge of the anthropometry of people with disabilities as far back as 1990, work towards bridging the gap and enabling ergonomic standardization has not progressed since then globally. The lack of standardization in anthropometric data on people with a physical disability continues to complicate provision of data for mobility and accessibility design and hampers accessibility standardization efforts.

Item ID: 76898
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Keywords: Universal Design, architectural accessibility, disabled persons, standardization, standards
Copyright Information: © 2022 – IOS Press. All rights reserved.
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2022 08:52
FoR Codes: 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science > 420199 Allied health and rehabilitation science not elsewhere classified @ 50%
40 ENGINEERING > 4010 Engineering practice and education > 401001 Engineering design @ 50%
SEO Codes: 13 CULTURE AND SOCIETY > 1301 Arts > 130101 Design @ 50%
28 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 2801 Expanding knowledge > 280104 Expanding knowledge in built environment and design @ 50%
Downloads: Total: 2
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page