Virtual OSCE Delivery and Quality Assurance During a Pandemic: Implications for the Future

Saad, Shannon, Richmond, Cassandra, Jones, Karina, Schlipalius, Michelle, Rienits, Helen, and Malau-Aduli, Bunmi S. (2022) Virtual OSCE Delivery and Quality Assurance During a Pandemic: Implications for the Future. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. 844884.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (612kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.844884
 
1
640


Abstract

Background: During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused worldwide disruption to the delivery of clinical assessments, requiring medicals schools to rapidly adjust their design of established tools. Derived from the traditional face-to-face Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), the virtual OSCE (vOSCE) was delivered online, using a range of school-dependent designs. The quality of these new formats was evaluated remotely through virtual quality assurance (vQA). This study synthesizes the vOSCE and vQA experiences of stakeholders from participating Australian medical schools based on a Quality framework.

Methods: This study utilized a descriptive phenomenological qualitative design. Focus group discussions (FGD) were held with 23 stakeholders, including examiners, academics, simulated patients, professional staff, students and quality assurance examiners. The data was analyzed using a theory-driven conceptual Quality framework.

Results: The vOSCE was perceived as a relatively fit-for purpose assessment during pandemic physical distancing mandates. Additionally, the vOSCE was identified as being value-for-money and was noted to provide procedural benefits which lead to an enhanced experience for those involved. However, despite being largely delivered fault-free, the current designs are considered limited in the scope of skills they can assess, and thus do not meet the established quality of the traditional OSCE.

Conclusions: Whilst virtual clinical assessments are limited in their scope of assessing clinical competency when compared with the traditional OSCE, their integration into programs of assessment does, in fact, have significant potential. Scholarly review of stakeholder experiences has elucidated quality aspects that can inform iterative improvements to the design and implementation of future vOSCEs.

Item ID: 73713
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 2296-858X
Copyright Information: Copyright © 2022 Saad, Richmond, Jones, Schlipalius, Rienits and Malau-Aduli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Date Deposited: 30 May 2022 01:16
FoR Codes: 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4299 Other health sciences > 429999 Other health sciences not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes: 20 HEALTH > 2099 Other health > 209999 Other health not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 640
Last 12 Months: 8
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page