Assessing the value of acoustic indices to distinguish species and quantify activity: a case study using frogs

Indraswari, Karlina, Bower, Deborah S., Tucker, David, Schwarzkopf, Lin, Towsey, Michael, and Roe, Paul (2020) Assessing the value of acoustic indices to distinguish species and quantify activity: a case study using frogs. Freshwater Biology, 65 (1). pp. 142-152.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13222
15


Abstract

1. Soundscapes can provide information about a wide range of habitats and species through the recording of vocalisations over long temporal scales. Because of the large volumes of data collected, computational approaches, such as the application of acoustic indices, are required to extract useful information from long-duration recordings.

2. Acoustic indices summarise various soundscape features into frequency ranges over defined time intervals and can aid in the visual exploration, detection, and analysis of species vocalisation patterns. Here, we examine the performance of combinations of three acoustic indices commonly used in visual exploration, the acoustic complexity index, the temporal entropy spectrum index, and the event spectrum index, and assess their ability to distinguish species and describe acoustic features commonly used to detect species and analyse activity. Our case study focuses on three frog species with distinct call structures from Bickerton Island, Northern Territory, Australia. Call structure was categorised based on the number of pulses and harmonics.

3. We summarised acoustic activity by calculating acoustic indices in 256 equal-sized bins over the entire the frequency spectrum, for 30-s intervals, and found that acoustic index values could be used to distinguish species and describe acoustic features. The acoustic complexity index was the most effective index for distinguishing species. To describe acoustic features, we examined correlations between acoustic index values and summarised acoustic features, including call rate, total duration, loudness and signal-to-noise ratio. In single-pulsed species with no harmonics, we found spectral index values were significantly and sometimes strongly correlated with acoustic features. In comparison, species with harmonics were found to be weakly and less frequently correlated with acoustic features even if sampled calls were loud and have high signal-to-noise ratio. We suggest that acoustic indices have the potential to describe acoustic features in single-pulsed species but are limited in those with harmonics.

4. We conclude that acoustic indices can be a useful tool to distinguish some anuran species and to broadly understand specific acoustic features used to analyse calling activity over long periods of time. Further research is required to better understand the relationships between acoustic indices and acoustic features to determine the general utility of indices to detect and distinguish audible species and to identify other acoustic features of various taxa.

Item ID: 67356
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1365-2427
Keywords: amphibia, conservation biology, freshwaters, population, survey/description
Copyright Information: © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funders: South32, Australian Research Council (ARC), Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Anindilyakwa Land Council
Projects and Grants: ARC Linkage Project, Grant/Award Number LP150100675
Date Deposited: 05 May 2021 04:24
FoR Codes: 41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4104 Environmental management > 410402 Environmental assessment and monitoring @ 100%
SEO Codes: 18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1806 Terrestrial systems and management > 180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystems @ 100%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page