Priorities and motivations of marine coastal restoration research
Bayraktarov, Elisa, Brisbane, Shantala, Hagger, Valerie, Smith, Carter S., Wilson, Kerrie A., Lovelock, Catherine E., Gillies, Chris, Steven, Andrew D.L., and Saunders, Megan I. (2020) Priorities and motivations of marine coastal restoration research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7. 484.
|
PDF (Published version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Active restoration is becoming an increasingly important conservation intervention to counteract the degradation of marine coastal ecosystems. Understanding what has motivated the scientific community to research the restoration of marine coastal ecosystems and how restoration research projects are funded is essential if we want to scale-up restoration interventions to meaningful extents. Here, we systematically review and synthesize data to understand the motivations for research on the restoration of coral reefs, seagrass, mangroves, saltmarsh, and oyster reefs. We base this analysis off a published database of marine restoration studies, originally designed to estimate the cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration, derived from mostly scientific studies published in peer-reviewed and some gray literature. For the present study, the database was updated with fields aimed at assessing the motivations, outcomes, and funding sources for each project. We classify restoration motivations into five categories: biotic, experimental, idealistic, legislative, and pragmatic. Moreover, we evaluate the variables measured and outcomes reported by the researchers and evaluate whether projects adhered to the Society for Ecological Restoration's (SER) standards for the practice of ecological restoration. The most common motivation of the scientific community to study restoration in marine coastal ecosystems was experimental i.e., to seek experimental data to answer ecological research questions or improve restoration approach, as expected since mostly peer-reviewed literature was evaluated here. There were differences in motivations among the five coastal ecosystems. For instance, biodiversity enhancement was the most common case for a biotic motivation in mangrove restoration projects. The most common metrics evaluated were growth/productivity, survivorship, habitat function, physical attributes, and reproduction. For most ecosystems, ecological outcomes were frequently reported, with socio-economic implications of the restoration rarely mentioned, except for mangroves. Projects were largely funded by governmental grants with some investment from private donations, non-governmental organizations, and the involvement of volunteers. Our findings and database provide critical data to align future research of the scientific community with the real social, economic and policy needs required to scale-up marine coastal restoration projects.
Item ID: | 66782 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Research - C1) |
ISSN: | 2296-7745 |
Keywords: | conservation funding, marine coastal restoration, motivations for ecological restoration, restoration metrics, restoration outcome, restoration success, standards for the practice of ecological restoration |
Copyright Information: | Copyright © 2020 Bayraktarov, Brisbane, Hagger, Smith, Wilson, Lovelock, Gillies, Steven and Saunders. This is an Open Access article under the terms and conditions of the CC-BY licence. |
Funders: | Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australian Research Council (ARC), ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (ARC-CoEED) |
Date Deposited: | 15 Apr 2021 23:02 |
FoR Codes: | 41 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 4104 Environmental management > 410405 Environmental rehabilitation and restoration @ 100% |
SEO Codes: | 18 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT > 1802 Coastal and estuarine systems and management > 180206 Rehabilitation or conservation of coastal or estuarine environments @ 100% |
Downloads: |
Total: 822 Last 12 Months: 14 |
More Statistics |