Clinicians' consent law knowledge: the case for education
Craig, D.P., and Thompson, F. (2020) Clinicians' consent law knowledge: the case for education. Focus on Health Professional Education, 21 (3). pp. 65-77.
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
Abstract
Introduction: The short-term objectives of this study were to investigate clinicians' confidence with, and knowledge of, consent laws, their behaviour regarding familiarisation with patients' advance care plans and the potential benefit of brief education. Education covered patients' rights to refuse treatment, including via advance directive, and the legislated hierarchy of decision-making authority.
Methods: Throughout 2018, all clinicians at one Queensland Hospital and Health Service were invited to attend a 1-hour legal education session. The study used a cross-sectional survey to measure clinicians' knowledge before and after education. Responses from 316 pre- and 319 post-education questionnaires were analysed.
Results: A 1-hour legal education session improved clinicians' understanding of legislated consent hierarchy and patients' rights. Pre education, 4.1% of participants correctly identified the lawful consent hierarchy, rising to 65.5% after education. Accuracy increased significantly after education; however, substantial errors persisted.
Conclusions: The potential benefit of education to increase multidisciplinary clinicians' legal knowledge was supported. Education can ensure that clinicians are made aware of patients' rights and the potential complexity of lawful substitute decision making.
Item ID: | 66059 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Research - C1) |
ISSN: | 2204-7662 |
Keywords: | aging, advance care planning, advance directives, decision-making, medical education, legislation |
Related URLs: | |
Date Deposited: | 17 Feb 2021 18:01 |
FoR Codes: | 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4203 Health services and systems > 420317 Patient safety @ 100% |
Downloads: |
Total: 1 |
More Statistics |