Structural and non-structural statistical methods: implications for delineating geochemical anomalies

Roshanravan, Bijan, Tabatabaei, Seyed Hasan, Kreuzer, Oliver, Moini, Hamid, and Parsa, Mohammad (2020) Structural and non-structural statistical methods: implications for delineating geochemical anomalies. Applied Earth Science, 129 (3). pp. 111-121.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website:


Geochemical sampling media, be they rock chip, soil or stream sediment samples, routinely collected in mineral exploration, are key to detecting mineralisation-related geochemical dispersion patterns. Notwithstanding the diversity of methods applied to geochemical anomaly detection, they can be broadly divided into two major groups, namely structural and non-structural techniques. The former group covers those methods in which threshold values are assigned based on sample location while the sample locations are not required in the application of the non-structural techniques. In this study, rock chip samples from the Shadan porphyry copper-gold deposit are used to address the question as to how structural and non-structural methods can separate geochemical populations for the purpose of a deposit-scale study. It was revealed that the two structural techniques used in this study, concentration-area (C-A) fractal and U-spatial statistic methods, outperformed the nonstructural techniques employed in this study.

Item ID: 64360
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1743-2758
Keywords: Geochemical anomaly, structural and non-structural methods, concentration-area (C-A) fractal, U-spatial statistic, Shadan porphyry deposit
Copyright Information: © 2020 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and The AusIMM.
Date Deposited: 16 Sep 2020 07:30
FoR Codes: 37 EARTH SCIENCES > 3703 Geochemistry > 370399 Geochemistry not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 1
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page