Paper based vs. electronic records for clinical audit: evidence of documentation of medication safety monitoring in youth prescribed antipsychotics

Aouira, Nisreen, Khan, Sohil, McDermott, Brett, Heussler, Helen, Haywood, Alison, Karaksha, Abdullah, and Bor, William (2020) Paper based vs. electronic records for clinical audit: evidence of documentation of medication safety monitoring in youth prescribed antipsychotics. Children and Youth Services Review, 109. 104666.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.201...


Abstract

Background: Since the development of digital records, claims have been made that they improve audits. Clinical audits play important role in evaluation of evidence-practice gaps. Antipsychotic medications are one of the commonly prescribed group of drugs in severe adverse mental conditions. Youth and young people are highly prone to develop drug induced metabolic syndrome. Present study evaluated the extent of data documentation on evidence for metabolic monitoring of anti-psychotics and compared paper based to electronic records with good documentation standards.

Methods: First phase of this study involved a retrospective clinical audit of paper-based documentation on the extent of documentation of weight (primary outcome); lipid and blood glucose (secondary outcomes) of youth prescribed atypical antipsychotics. This was undertaken in three public mental health clinics and a public/private developmental service in Australia based on paper-based documentation. The second phase included auditing electronic data capture from one community clinic. Evidence of documentation was compared with practice standards and published clinical audits (adherence rate benchmark: 40-60%).

Results: A total of 310 cases were assessed of which 51 and 37 cases met the eligibility criteria for paper-based and electronic based audit respectively as a component of clinical audit. Evidence of paper documentation of weight was 43% among participants and was comparable with other published clinical audits (p = 0.07) with poor monitoring rates for other blood tests. Findings revealed poor rate of documentation at 35.1% (13 cases), 5.4% (2 cases) and 8.1% (3 cases) for weight, lipid assessments and glucose monitoring, respectively based on electronic records.

Conclusion: Present study demonstrate lack of good documentation practices on metabolic monitoring of youth prescribed antipsychotics. It appears transitioning from paper to electronic records did not impact the rate of increase in documentation of metabolic monitoring. This study recommends inclusion of e-monitoring icon with built in metabolic monitoring chart as a component of youth prescribed antipsychotic case records. Good documentation practice is a first step in determination of causality of antipsychotics induced metabolic syndrome. Appropriate strategies to a user-friendly electronic reminder system will be crucial to address on the mechanistic of documentation.

Item ID: 62668
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1873-7765
Copyright Information: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd.
Funders: Griffith University
Date Deposited: 01 Apr 2020 07:38
FoR Codes: 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences > 119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes: 92 HEALTH > 9202 Health and Support Services > 920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomes @ 50%
92 HEALTH > 9299 Other Health > 929999 Health not elsewhere classified @ 50%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page