Comparison between 2 types of radiofrequency ablation systems in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial

Faruque, Ryan, Matthews, Brent, Bahho, Zaid, Doma, Kenji, Manoharan, Varaguana, Wilkinson, Matthew, and McEwen, Peter (2019) Comparison between 2 types of radiofrequency ablation systems in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 7 (4). 2325967119835224.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (650kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119835224
 
22


Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation is commonly used in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). New technology devices incorporating a plasma bubble may generate lower intra-articular temperatures and be more efficient.

PURPOSE: To compare a plasma ablation device with a standard ablation device in arthroscopic RCR to determine which system is superior in terms of intra-articular heat generation and diathermy efficiency.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing primary RCR. Patients were randomized preoperatively to the standard ablation group (n = 20) or plasma ablation group (n = 20). A thermometer was inserted into the shoulder joint during surgery, and the temperature, surgery, and diathermy times of radiofrequency ablation were measured continually.

RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the standard ablation group and plasma ablation group for maximum temperature (38.20°C and 39.38°C, respectively; P = .433), mean temperature (31.66°C and 30.64°C, respectively; P = .757), minimum temperature (21.83°C and 23.45°C, respectively; P = .584), and baseline temperature (28.49°C and 29.94°C, respectively; P = .379). Similarly, no significant differences were found for surgery time (74 and 75 minutes, respectively; P = .866) and diathermy time (10 minutes for both; P = .678). Seven patients registered transient high temperatures greater than 45°C.

CONCLUSION: There was no difference between plasma ablation and standard ablation in terms of intra-articular temperature in the joint and diathermy efficiency. Transient high intra-articular temperatures occurred in both groups.

Item ID: 58910
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 2325-9671
Keywords: diathermy; shoulder surgery; ablation; intra-articular temperature
Copyright Information: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Date Deposited: 15 Jul 2019 06:16
FoR Codes: 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1103 Clinical Sciences > 110314 Orthopaedics @ 100%
SEO Codes: 92 HEALTH > 9201 Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions) > 920116 Skeletal System and Disorders (incl. Arthritis) @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 22
Last 12 Months: 22
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page