Response to correspondence letter “species responses to oil palm: cautionary considerations for multi-site extrapolation”
Pardo Vargas, Lain Efrain, de Oliveira Roque, Fabio, Campbell, Mason, and Laurance, William F. (2019) Response to correspondence letter “species responses to oil palm: cautionary considerations for multi-site extrapolation”. Biological Conservation, 229. pp. 181-182.
![]() |
PDF (Published version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.11...
Abstract
We appreciate the correspondence related to our paper (Pardo et al., 2018a), which raises three main concerns about our work: 1) an apparent extrapolation of the information we gathered in the Llanos region of Colombia to the entire country; 2) a putative limitation in our study design; and 3) a criticism of what was characterized as a misleading focus on non-threatened species. Below we address each criticism in turn.
Item ID: | 58493 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Scholarly Work) |
ISSN: | 1873-2917 |
Copyright Information: | © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2019 04:52 |
FoR Codes: | 07 AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCES > 0701 Agriculture, Land and Farm Management > 070101 Agricultural Land Management @ 50% 05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050211 Wildlife and Habitat Management @ 50% |
SEO Codes: | 82 PLANT PRODUCTION AND PLANT PRIMARY PRODUCTS > 8203 Industrial Crops > 820399 Industrial Crops not elsewhere classified @ 50% 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960805 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity at Regional or Larger Scales @ 50% |
Downloads: |
Total: 3 |
More Statistics |