How many facts make an "informed patient"? Practical challenges for junior doctors in acquiring surgical informed consent
de Costa, Josephine, De Costa, Alan, and Shircore, Mandy (2019) How many facts make an "informed patient"? Practical challenges for junior doctors in acquiring surgical informed consent. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 89 (S1). ML002. pp. 106-1063.
|
PDF (Abstract Only)
- Published Version
Download (30kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose: In addition to technical surgical skills, the complete surgeon requires skills in communication and consenting patients. This protects patients, hospitals, and doctors themselves, but also promotes best practice. However, surgical informed consent (SIC) is commonly acquired by junior doctors (defined as PGY1 until completion of specialist training). Little is known about the quality of SIC that doctors at this level may acquire. This study aimed to synthesize known evidence on challenges faced by junior doctors on this issue.
Methodology:The authors conducted a systematic review of all English-language studies published from 1 January 2007 looking at junior doctors (considered to be from PGY1 to the end of specialist training) and any issues that arose around acquiring SIC. A qualitative synthesis was then conducted.
Results: Junior doctors understanding of the legal standards of consent, including both capacity/competence and the concepts of material risk, varied considerably across studies. Documentation and discussion of possible complications in surgery was found to be highly variable within both trainees and consultants consenting practices. Few junior doctors discussed alternative treatment options, including the possibility of having no treatment; evidence on discussion of benefits and recovery were conflicting. Overall documentation of the SIC process was poor.
Conclusions: While junior doctors are commonly responsible for acquir-ing SIC, this study shows that there are significant practical deficiencies in how they discharge this duty. As a result, SIC acquired by junior doctors may not always comply with required legal standards, which may open up this cohort, and their hospitals, to legal action.
Item ID: | 58311 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Article (Abstract) |
ISSN: | 1445-2197 |
Additional Information: | Presented at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons 88th Annual Scientific Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 6–10 May 2019 |
Date Deposited: | 06 Feb 2020 02:15 |
FoR Codes: | 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1103 Clinical Sciences > 110323 Surgery @ 70% 18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law > 180126 Tort Law @ 30% |
SEO Codes: | 92 HEALTH > 9202 Health and Support Services > 920205 Health Education and Promotion @ 80% 94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940406 Legal Processes @ 20% |
Downloads: |
Total: 120 Last 12 Months: 7 |
More Statistics |