Global baselines and benchmarks for fish biomass: comparing remote reefs and fisheries closures

McClanahan, Tim R., Schroeder, Robert E., Friedlander, Alan M., Vigliola, Laurent, Wantiez, Laurent, Caselle, Jennifer E., Graham, Nicholas A.J., Wilson, Shaun, Edgar, Graham J., Stuart-Smith, Rick D., Oddenyo, Remy M., and Cinner, J.E. (2019) Global baselines and benchmarks for fish biomass: comparing remote reefs and fisheries closures. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 612. pp. 167-192.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (3MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12874
 
3
70


Abstract

Baselines and benchmarks (B&Bs) are needed to evaluate the ecological status and fisheries potential of coral reefs. B&Bs may depend on habitat features and energetic limitations that constrain biomass within the natural variability of the environment and fish behaviors. To evaluate if broad B&Bs exist, we compiled data on the biomass of fishes in similar to 1000 reefs with no recent history of fishing in 19 ecoregions. These reefs spanned the full longitude and latitude of Indian and Pacific Ocean reefs and included older high-compliance fisheries closures (>15 yr closure) and remote reef areas (>9 h travel time from fisheries markets). There was no significant change in biomass over the 15 to 48 yr closure period but closures had only similar to 40% of the biomass (740 kg ha(-1), lower confidence interval [LCI] = 660 kg ha(-1), upper confidence interval [UCI] = 810 kg ha(-1), n = 157) of remote tropical reefs (1870 [1730, 2000] kg ha(-1), n = 503). Remote subtropical reefs had lower biomass (950 [860, 1040] kg ha(-1), n = 329) than tropical reefs. Closures and remote reef fish biomass responded differently to environmental variables of coral cover, net primary productivity, and light, indicating that remote reefs are more limited by productivity and habitat than closures. Closures in fished seascapes are unlikely to achieve the biomass and community composition of remote reefs, which suggests fisheries benchmarks will differ substantially from wilderness baselines. A fishery benchmark (B-0) of similar to 1000 kg ha(-1) adjusted for geography is suggested for fisheries purposes. For ecological purposes, a wilderness baseline of similar to 1900 kg ha(-1) is appropriate for including large and mobile species not well protected by closures.

Item ID: 58191
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1616-1599
Keywords: Baselines, Coral reef fish, Fisheries and ecological indicators, Pristine or virgin biomass, Sustainability
Copyright Information: © The authors 2019. Open Access under Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un-restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited.
Funders: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Associations Marine Science for Management Program (MASMA)., Department for International Development (DFID), Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), National Environmental Research Council (NERC)
Projects and Grants: DFID Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation programme
Date Deposited: 01 May 2019 07:33
FoR Codes: 16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1604 Human Geography > 160499 Human Geography not elsewhere classified @ 100%
05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity @ 0%
05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity @ 0%
SEO Codes: 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9605 Ecosystem Assessment and Management > 960507 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Marine Environments @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 70
Last 12 Months: 41
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page