Correcting for unequal catchability in sex ratio and population size estimates

McKnight, Donald T., and Ligon, Day (2017) Correcting for unequal catchability in sex ratio and population size estimates. PLoS ONE, 12 (8).

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (11MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0...
 
4
134


Abstract

Wildlife populations often exhibit unequal catchability between subgroups such as males and females. This heterogeneity of capture probabilities can bias both population size and sex ratio estimates. Several authors have suggested that this problem can be overcome by treating males and females as separate populations and calculating a population estimate for each of them. However, this suggestion has received little testing, and many researchers do not implement it. Therefore, we used two simulations to test the utility of this method. One simulated a closed population, while the other simulated an open population and used the robust design to calculate population sizes. We tested both simulations with multiple levels of heterogeneity, and we used a third simulation to test several methods for detecting heterogeneity of capture probabilities. We found that treating males and females as separate populations produced more accurate population and sex ratio estimates. The benefits of this method were particularly pronounced for sex ratio estimates. When males and females were included as a single population, the sex ratio estimates became inaccurate when even slight heterogeneity was present, but when males and females were treated separately, the estimates were accurate even when large biases were present. Nevertheless, treating males and females separately reduced precision, and this method may not be appropriate when capture and recapture rates are low. None of the methods for detecting heterogeneity were robust, and we do not recommend that researchers rely on them. Rather, we suggest separating populations by sex, age, or other subgroups whenever sample sizes permit.

Item ID: 52882
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1932-6203
Additional Information:

Copyright: © 2017 McKnight, Ligon. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2018 22:30
FoR Codes: 06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES > 0602 Ecology > 060207 Population Ecology @ 100%
SEO Codes: 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9608 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity > 960899 Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of Environments not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 134
Last 12 Months: 12
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page