The effect of augmented feedback type and frequency on velocity-based training-induced adaptation and retention
Nagata, Akinori, Doma, Kenji, Yamashita, Daichi, Hasegawa, Hiroshi, and Mori, Shuji (2020) The effect of augmented feedback type and frequency on velocity-based training-induced adaptation and retention. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 34 (11). pp. 3110-3117.
|
PDF (Accepted Author Version)
- Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the benefits of 4-weeks of velocity-based training (VBT) using different augmented feedback (AugFb) types and the frequency of AugFb, and whether adaptations are retained 10 days post-training. Thirty-seven collegiate male rugby players were divided into groups that received immediate-feedback (ImFb; n=9), visual-feedback (ViFb; n=10), average-feedback (AvgFb; n=10) and no-feedback (NoFb; n=8) during each VBT session consisting of 3 sets of 5 repetitions of loaded jump squats. The ImFb group received AugFb regarding lifting velocity under loaded jump squats (LV-JS) following every jump, whereas LV-JS measures were averaged following each set of jumps and presented to the AvgFb group. The loaded jump squats were video-recorded and displayed as kinematic feedback for the ViFb group following each set, although no feedback was provided for the NoFb group. LV-JS measures were reported at baseline, during each training session and 10-days post training. LV-JS measures were significantly greater for the ImFb Group compared to the other groups during a number of post-baseline time points (P<0.05). Furthermore, at 4-weeks of VBT and 10 days post-retention, effect size (ES) calculations showed that LV-JS measures were greater with moderate to large effects for the ImFb group compared to the NoFb (ES=1.02-1.25), AvgFb (ES=0.78-0.82) and ViFb (ES=0.74-1.60), respectively. However, LV-JS measures were reduced with moderate to large effects 10 days post-retention for the ViFb (ES=-0.60) and NoFb (ES=-0.85) groups. Providing LV-JS feedback following each jump appears to optimize performance and should be considered as a training tool during VBT.
| Item ID: | 52651 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Research - C1) |
| ISSN: | 1533-4287 |
| Keywords: | jump velocity; knowledge of performance; knowledge of results |
| Copyright Information: | © 2018 National Strength and Conditioning Association |
| Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2018 23:54 |
| FoR Codes: | 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4207 Sports science and exercise > 420799 Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified @ 50% 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4207 Sports science and exercise > 420703 Motor control @ 50% |
| SEO Codes: | 92 HEALTH > 9299 Other Health > 929999 Health not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
| Downloads: |
Total: 1088 Last 12 Months: 40 |
| More Statistics |
Actions (Repository Staff Only)
 |
Item Control Page |