Comparative evaluation of anopheline sampling methods in three localities in Indonesia

St.Laurent, Brandyce, Sukowati, Supratman, Burton, Timothy A., Bretz, David, Zio, Mulyadi, Firman, Syah, Sumardi, , Sudibyo, Heru, Safitri, Amalia, Suwito, , Asih, Puji B., Kosasih, Sully, Shinta, , Hawley, William A., Burkot, Thomas R., Collins, Frank H., Syafruddin, Din, and Lobo, Neil F. (2018) Comparative evaluation of anopheline sampling methods in three localities in Indonesia. Malaria Journal, 17 (13).

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (1MB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website:


Background: The effectiveness of vector control efforts can vary based on the interventions used and local mosquito behaviour and adaptability. In many settings, biting patterns of Anopheles mosquitoes can shift in response to interventions targeting indoor-biting mosquitoes, often resulting in higher proportions of mosquitoes feeding outside or at times when people are not protected. These behaviourally resistant mosquitoes have been shown to sustain residual malaria transmission and limit control efforts. Therefore, it is important to accurately sample mosquitoes to understand their behaviour.

Methods: A variety of traps were evaluated in three geographically diverse sites in malaria-endemic Indonesia to investigate local mosquito feeding behaviour and determine effective traps for surveillance.

Results: Eight traps were evaluated in three sites: Canti village, Lampung, Kaliharjo village, Purworejo, and Saketa village, Halmahera, Indonesia, including the gold standard human landing collection (HLC) and a variety of traps targeting host-seeking and resting mosquitoes both indoors and outdoors. Trapping, using indoor and outdoor HLC, the Ifakara tent trap C, goat and human-occupied tents, resting pots and boxes, and CDC miniature light traps was conducted for 16 nights in two sites and 8 nights in a third site, using a Latin square design. Trap efficacy varied by site, with outdoor HLC yielding the highest catch rates in Canti and Kaliharjo and a goat-baited tent trap proving most effective in Saketa. In Canti village, anthropophilic Anopheles sundaicus were caught indoors and outdoors using HLCs, peaking in the early morning. In Kaliharjo, a variety of mosquitoes were caught, mostly outdoors throughout the night. HLC was ineffective in Saketa, the only site where a goat-baited tent trap was tested. This trap was effective in catching zoophilic vectors outdoors before midnight.

Conclusions: Different trapping methods were suitable for different species, likely reflecting differences in behaviour among species. The three villages, each located on a different island in the Indonesian archipelago, contained mosquito populations with unique behaviours. These data suggest that the effectiveness of specific vector monitoring and control measures may vary by location.

Item ID: 52155
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1475-2875
Keywords: Anopheles, Sampling, Vector ecology, Indonesia, Malaria
Additional Information:

© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Funders: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF)
Projects and Grants: BMGF 45114
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2018 07:39
FoR Codes: 42 HEALTH SCIENCES > 4203 Health services and systems > 420315 One health @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 931
Last 12 Months: 6
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page