A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance

Rahman, H. M. Tuihedur, Saint Ville, Arlette S., Song, Andrew M., Po, June Y.T., Berthet, Elsa, Brammer, Jeremy R., Brunet, Nicolas D., Jayaprakash, Lingaraj G., Lowitt, Kristen N., Rastogi, Archi, Reed, Graeme, and Hickey, Gordon M. (2017) A framework for analyzing institutional gaps in natural resource governance. International Journal of the Commons, 11 (2). pp. 823-853.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (569kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ijc.758
 
10
68


Abstract

In this paper, we present the Inter-Institutional Gap (IIG) framework as a novel approach to conceptualizing the often-overlooked interconnectivity of different rule-levels between formal and informal institutions in a natural resource system. This framework goes beyond the existing concepts of legal pluralism, institutional void, structural hole, and cultural mismatch, each of which offer valuable insights to particular gaps between formal and informal institutions, but do not sufficiently address the interaction at every rule level (i.e. constitutional choice, collective choice and operational choice rules). In order to demonstrate the potential of our framework for better understanding the underlying causes of inter-institutional gaps, we apply it to four case studies that encompass diverse geographical locations, governance levels, and social-ecological systems. Results reveal that institutional gaps tend to exist when there are unintended, unforeseen or hidden gaps between the different rule levels operating among the different institutions involved in governing a single resource system. More specifically we observe that: (i) inter-institutional gaps are co-existing, therefore if a certain gap is identified, other gaps may be expected; (ii) certain gaps may reveal latent gaps; and (iii) intermediaries may be key to addressing inter-institutional gaps. In many cases, sustainable natural resource management and regulation cannot be achieved without directly addressing the inter-institutional gaps that exist between formal and informal institutions operating in the same resource system. The framework facilitates analysis and understanding of multi-level governance structures in pursuit of addressing complex natural resource management issues.

Item ID: 51621
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1875-0281
Keywords: collaboration, governance systems, public policy, rules-in-use, sustainable development, top-down approaches
Additional Information:

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license (unless stated otherwise) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright is retained by the author(s).

Date Deposited: 22 Nov 2017 07:51
FoR Codes: 05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050209 Natural Resource Management @ 60%
16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1606 Political Science > 160609 Political Theory and Political Philosophy @ 10%
16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1604 Human Geography > 160499 Human Geography not elsewhere classified @ 30%
SEO Codes: 97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society @ 50%
96 ENVIRONMENT > 9609 Land and Water Management > 960999 Land and Water Management of Environments not elsewhere classified @ 50%
Downloads: Total: 68
Last 12 Months: 31
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page