Safety of varenicline tartrate and counseling versus counseling alone for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial for inpatients (STOP study)

Carson, Kristin Veronica, Smith, Brian James, Brinn, Malcolm Philip, Peters, Matthew J., Fitridge, Robert, Koblar, Simon A., Jannes, Jim, Singh, Kuljit, Veale, Antony J., Goldsworthy, Sharon, Litt, John, Edwards, David, Hnin, Khin Moe, and Esterman, Adrian Jeffrey (2014) Safety of varenicline tartrate and counseling versus counseling alone for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial for inpatients (STOP study). Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 16 (11). pp. 1495-1502.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu112
6


Abstract

Inpatient medical settings offer an opportunistic environment for initiating smoking cessation interventions to patients reflecting on their health. Current evidence has shown the superior efficacy of varenicline tartrate (VT) for smoking cessation compared with other tobacco cessation therapies; however, recent evidence also has highlighted concerns about the safety and tolerability of VT. Given these apprehensions, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VT plus quitline-counseling compared to quitline-counseling alone in the inpatient medical setting.

Adult patients (n = 392, 20-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to 3 hospitals were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice daily) plus quitline-counseling (VT+C), (n = 196) or quitline-counseling alone (n = 196).

VT was well tolerated in the inpatient setting among subjects admitted with acute smoking-related illnesses (mean age 52.8 +/- 2.89 and 53.7 +/- 2.77 years in the VT+C and counseling alone groups, respectively). The most common self-reported adverse event during the 12-week treatment phase was nausea (16.3% in the VT+C group compared with 1.5% in the counseling alone group). Thirteen deaths occurred during the study period (n = 6 were in the VT+C arm compared with n = 7 in the counseling alone arm). All of these subjects had known comorbidities or developed underlying comorbidities.

VT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated opportunistic treatment for inpatient smokers who have related chronic disease. Based on the proven efficacy of varenicline from outpatient studies and our recent inpatient evidence, we suggest it be considered as part of standard care in the hospital setting.

Item ID: 50798
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1469-994X
Keywords: smoking, smoking cessation, comorbidity, counseling, inpatient, nausea, outpatients, safety, tartrates, arm, varenicline, adverse event, stop trial, self-report
Funders: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide
Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2017 02:32
FoR Codes: 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1117 Public Health and Health Services > 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes: 92 HEALTH > 9204 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) > 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified @ 100%
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page