2017 Scientific Consensus Statement: land use impacts on the Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition. Chapter 4: management options and their effectiveness
Eberhard, Rachel, Thorburn, Peter, Rolfe, John, Taylor, Bruce, Ronan, Mike, Webber, Tony, Flint, Nicole, Kroon, Frederieke, Silburn, Mark, Bartley, Rebecca, Davis, Aaron, Wilkinson, Scott, Lewis, Stephen, Star, Megan, Poggio, Mark, Windle, Jill, Marshall, Nadine, Hill, Rosemary, Maclean, Kirsten, Lyons, Pethie, Robinson, Cathy, Adame, Fernanda, Selles, Amelia, Griffiths, Matthew, Gunn, John, and McCosker, Kevin (2017) 2017 Scientific Consensus Statement: land use impacts on the Great Barrier Reef water quality and ecosystem condition. Chapter 4: management options and their effectiveness. Report Section. State of Queensland.
|
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (4MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This chapter seeks to answer the following questions: 1. What are the values of the Great Barrier Reef? 2. How effective are better agricultural practices in improving water quality? 3. How can we improve the uptake of better agricultural practices? 4. What water quality improvement can non-agricultural land uses contribute? 5. How can Great Barrier Reef water quality improvement programs be improved? Each section summarises the currently available peer reviewed literature and comments on implications for management and research gaps. This chapter has a wider scope than previous Scientific Consensus Statements, including, for the first time, the social and governance dimensions of management and the management of non-agricultural land uses. These new sections are constrained by a lack of Great Barrier Reef–specific data and information. The relevance of information from other locations must be carefully considered. In comparison, the agricultural practice change and economics sections provide an update on material compiled as part of the 2013 Scientific Consensus Statement. This report has been confined to peer reviewed literature, which is generally published in books and journals or major reports. There is additional evidence in grey literature, such as project and program reports, that has not been included here. Each section of this chapter has been compiled by a writing team and then revised following a series of review processes.