A robust methodology for comparing performances of clustering validity criteria

Vendramin, Lucas, Campello, Ricardo J.G.B., and Hruschka, Eduardo R. (2008) A robust methodology for comparing performances of clustering validity criteria. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (5249), pp. 237-247. From: SBIA 2008: 19th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 26-30 October 2008, Salvador, Brazil.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-8819...
 
3
1


Abstract

Many different clustering validity measures exist that are very useful in practice as quantitative criteria for evaluating the quality of data partitions. However, it is a hard task for the user to choose a specific measure when he or she faces such a variety of possibilities. The present paper introduces an alternative, robust methodology for comparing clustering validity measures that has been especially designed to get around some conceptual flaws of the comparison paradigm traditionally adopted in the literature. An illustrative example involving the comparison of the performances of four well-known validity measures over a collection of 7776 data partitions of 324 different data sets is presented.

Item ID: 47054
Item Type: Conference Item (Research - E1)
ISBN: 978-3-540-88189-6
Funders: CNPq, FAPESP
Date Deposited: 04 Jan 2017 08:04
FoR Codes: 01 MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES > 0104 Statistics > 010401 Applied Statistics @ 100%
SEO Codes: 97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970101 Expanding Knowledge in the Mathematical Sciences @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 1
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page