Is Esquire Nominees under assault?
Dabner, Justin (2016) Is Esquire Nominees under assault? CCH Tax Week, 2016 (11). 174. pp. 1-4.
|
PDF (Published Version)
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only |
Abstract
[Extract] The decision in Esquire Nominees Limited as Trustee of Manolas Trust v FCT 73 ATC 4114 has always seemed problematic. Together with FCT v Patcorp Investments Limited (formerly Patrick Corporation Limited) & Ors v FCT 76 ATC 4225, these cases have contributed to the opportunity for Australian taxpayers to take advantage of tax havens and the consequent need for controlled foreign company anti-avoidance legislation.
Now the Full Federal Court decision in Bywater Investments Limited & Ors v FCT 2015 ATC 20-549, by distinguishing Esquire Nominees, has cast doubt on the ability to rely on that authority in denying that a company is an Australian resident. Notably, a special leave application to the High Court has been lodged which, if granted, might signal that the High Court could be prepared to reconsider the principle established in Esquire Nominees.
| Item ID: | 46336 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Article (Non-Refereed Research) |
| ISSN: | 1320-9426 |
| Keywords: | esquire nominees, Bywater Investments Limited, tax, resident test |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Feb 2017 23:58 |
| FoR Codes: | 18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law > 180125 Taxation Law @ 100% |
| SEO Codes: | 94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9499 Other Law, Politics and Community Services > 949999 Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified @ 100% |
| Downloads: |
Total: 5 |
| More Statistics |
