Eagers, Jackie, Kaesehagen, Colleen, Lasen, Michelle, Brown, Nicole, Bonassi, Marianne, and Sealey, Rebecca (2016) Optimising the student experience: building student agency, learning communities and understanding of assessment. In: [Presented at 37th HERDSA Annual International Conference]. 4D. From: HERSDA 2016: 39th Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual International Conference: the shape of higher education, 4-7 July 2016, Freemantle, WA, Australia.

Preview	PDF (Abstract Only) - Accepted Version Download (16kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Abstract Only) - Published Version Download (47kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background/Context: Engaging students in pre-assessment activities designed to promote social construction of knowledge of assessment requirements and standards significantly improves student performance (Rust, Price, & O’Donovan, 2003).

Initiative/Practice: The aim was to actively engage students in workshops, wherein they collaborated with peers, to construct understanding of requirements and standards pertaining to complex, authentic assessment tasks.

Method(s) of evaluative data collection and analysis: Disciplinary academics collaborated with learning support staff to integrate peer learning activities into first and second year workshops, involving students in the co-creation of assessment handy hints. To generate the handy hints, first year students reviewed exemplars, while second year students responded to frequently asked questions. Assessment task descriptions and rubrics were used as resources. The student experience was evaluated through surveys and analysed as proportional Likert-scale data and open-ended responses.

Evidence of outcomes and effectiveness: The majority of students agreed that: 1) the purpose of handy hints co-creation was clear; 2) they felt comfortable participating; 3) the handy hints clarified assessment expectations; 4) they used the handy hints when completing the assignment; 5) exemplars helped to understand assessment standards; and 6) they felt more enabled to independently understand future assessment requirements. Perceived benefits and negative aspects of the project identified year-level differences: the first year student responses reflected a focus on the process of understanding assessment expectations, while the second year student responses reflected a focus on the use of additional assessment resources and participation in group discussions. Three types of preferences emerged from first and second year student responses regarding engagement in the co-creation of assessment handy hints. Students can be seen to be: 1) active agents for learning; 2) passive receivers of information; or 3) non engagers. These themes will be further explored in the presentation.

Item ID:	44734
Item Type:	Conference Item (Abstract / Summary)
Date Deposited:	12 Sep 2016 02:00
FoR Codes:	13 EDUCATION > 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy > 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy @ 100%
SEO Codes:	93 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 9303 Curriculum > 930301 Assessment and Evaluation of Curriculum @ 100%
Downloads:	Total: 150 Last 12 Months: 13
	More Statistics