The assessment partnership –assessing student readiness to practice

Sealey, Rebecca, Naumann, Fiona, Cameron, Melainie, and Pascoe, Deborah (2016) The assessment partnership –assessing student readiness to practice. In: Abstracts from Research to Practice 2016. 46. From: Research To Practice 2016, 14-16 April 2016, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Poster) - Presentation
Download (251kB) | Preview
View at Publisher Website: http://researchtopractice2016.com.au/wp-...
 
38


Abstract

Assessment is a critical component of the educational paradigm. Teaching, learning and assessment need to be aligned to optimise learning outcomes (Boud, 1995), and ensure graduates are safe and competent to practice in their professions (Eva, 2007; Holmboe et al. 2010; Van der Vleuten, 1996). In this session we will present and critically evaluate the roles of the student, the University, clinical supervisor/s, and the professional body in ensuring graduates' readiness to practice.

In order to maximise their learning, students need to take active roles in the learning process. We will report on research on the use of ePortfolios in which students collected and presented evidence that demonstrated their competency. Embedded in this research were students' reflections around their learning.

Assessment of clinical competency in the university environment has been criticised for lacking fidelity (ie: not being real, believable, or reflecting the work environment). Clinical employers want to be assured that graduates are "work ready". We will explore several creative, innovative, evidence-based strategies to increase the fidelity of university assessments so that assessors can be more assured of students' preparedness to enter the workplace.

Clinical placements offer excellent opportunities to assess students' performance in the environments in which they will eventually work. Although having greater fidelity than the university setting, significant threats to the validity of assessment remain in these environments. Particularly concerning are: variability between supervisors' judgments, and the unpredictability of clinical workplaces such that we cannot ensure that all students experience placements of the same difficulty of challenge. In this section we will present and critically evaluate a range of workplace assessments, allowing participants to consider what might work in different environments. We will further discuss ways in which assessments might be changed to manage threats to validity.

Item ID: 43704
Item Type: Conference Item (Poster)
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2016 01:59
FoR Codes: 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES > 1106 Human Movement and Sports Science > 110602 Exercise Physiology @ 50%
13 EDUCATION > 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy > 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy @ 50%
SEO Codes: 93 EDUCATION AND TRAINING > 9303 Curriculum > 930301 Assessment and Evaluation of Curriculum @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 38
Last 12 Months: 4
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page