Ho, K.S., and Ho, Y.H. (2006) Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Techniques in Coloproctology, 10 (3). pp. 193-197.

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only

 

29

1

Abstract

Background: Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy is believed to result in less postoperative pain because of a closed wound. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, without a perianal wound, should thus have lesser pain. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH).

Methods: Fifty patients with third-degree or early fourthdegree hemorrhoids who required surgery were recruited. Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either FH or SH. Data collected include operative time, hospital stay, fecal incontinence and pain scores, morbidity and complications.

Results: SH patients had less pain in the early postoperative period. There were no significant differences in hospital stay or major complications. One patient after SH required emergency reintervention for thrombosed hemorrhoids distal to the staple line. FH patients had more minor problems of bleeding, wound discharge and pruritus. Fecal incontinence was similar in the 2 groups but two of the three patients with daily incontinence to gas after SH claimed that their lifestyle was affected.

Conclusions: SH is safe to perform and results in less postoperative pain as well as less minor morbidity. Early reintervention and incontinence to gas compromising lifestyle occurred only after SH.

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page