de la Fuente, Eduardo (2013) 'Profane' rather than 'secular': Daniel Bell as cultural sociologist and critic of modern culture. Thesis Eleven, 118 (1). pp. 105-115.

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only

 

3

Abstract

Daniel Bell's writings are often cast as offering a contemporary jeremiad regarding the corrosive effects of culture upon the modern economic and social order. In this paper, I take the opposite approach and argue that Bell is a sensitive cultural analyst who is claiming that human experience ought not to be deprived of culture – understood as symbol and myth that tap into the felt need for human transcendence. Bell could therefore be seen as a strong advocate for the concept of culture, and for a cultural sociology. It is only that the modern (and postmodern) versions of culture do not realize the full potential of culture to move and inspire human actors. The conclusion is reached that what ails modern culture is neither rationalization nor secularization, but rather what Bell termed the 'Great Profanization'. Rendering culture profane is much more serious, and deleterious, than any of the other specific dynamics sociologists have diagnosed regarding modern culture.

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page