Mock-suspects' decisions to confess: the influence of eyewitness statements and identifications

Kebbell, Mark, and Daniels, Troy (2006) Mock-suspects' decisions to confess: the influence of eyewitness statements and identifications. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 13 (2). pp. 261-268.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website:


An experiment was conducted to investigate ways of increasing the likelihood of an offender confessing. Ninety participants were asked to commit a mock-crime that involved them stealing a wallet. Later the mock-offenders were presented with evidence from a witness who was said to have seen the offence. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions in which they were presented with a witness statement that either contained detailed correct information, not-detailed correct information, or incorrect information. Further, half in each condition were told the witness had identified them, while the other half were told the witness had not identified them. Participants were asked about their likelihood of confessing to the crime, and were asked what had influenced their decision. The results indicate that incorrect information made offenders less likely to confess, while being identified or not, had no impact. The results are discussed in relation to police interviewing techniques.

Item ID: 3699
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1934-1687
Date Deposited: 26 Nov 2009 03:23
FoR Codes: 17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES > 1701 Psychology > 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified @ 100%
SEO Codes: 97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences @ 100%
Downloads: Total: 1
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page