What are the perceived differences between assessing at Masters level and undergraduate level assessment? Some findings from an NTFS-funded project

Brown, Sally (2014) What are the perceived differences between assessing at Masters level and undergraduate level assessment? Some findings from an NTFS-funded project. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51 (3). pp. 265-276.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013....
 
2
1


Abstract

Assessment at Masters Level is the subject of a three-year UK National Teaching Fellowship Scheme (NTFS) project, 'Assimilate', which seeks to explore innovatory approaches in this field. More than 40 interviews were undertaken for the project with teachers at Masters level in the UK and internationally. Although national and institutional systems differentiate clearly in their documentation how assessment at M-level should differ from that at undergraduate level, in practice there is not necessarily such clarity. This article draws on how teachers and programme leaders on Masters level courses who were interviewed for the project described the differences in practice. It concludes that there is considerable confusion and ambivalence about what distinguishes one level from another and scope for further clarification.

Item ID: 33181
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1470-3300
Keywords: Masters level, level differentiation, authentic assessment, national teaching fellowship scheme, assimilate project
Date Deposited: 14 May 2014 09:50
Downloads: Total: 1
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page