Galloway, Kate (2014) Assisted reproductive technologies and human rights. Right Now, 11 February 2014.

Preview

PDF (Published Version) - Published Version Download (45kB) | Preview

Abstract

[Extract] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have challenged our thinking around what it means to be human. Associated with this is the dignity and humanity in a decision to become a parent, and how our genetic material is to be used. On the one hand we might claim a "reproductive right" as an expression of our personal autonomy and control over our bodies. On the other hand, we may call for reproductive justice – an idea that seeks to balance a complex matrix of competing claims for dignity of personhood. These claims may involve men and women as donors of gametes, women who carry a child to term, and the child themselves.

ART is regulated by legislation in every Australian state, and under Commonwealth law and policy. While a willing donation of sperm or ova to conceive a child may seem to promote personal autonomy, there are many ways in which human dignity can potentially be compromised through use of ART. This starts with how we understand control or "ownership" of gametes themselves, through to our right to be a parent, or to contribute to reproduction when we ourselves do not wish to be a parent.

Item ID:	32441
Item Type:	Article (Commentary)
Date Deposited:	22 Jul 2014 06:06
FoR Codes:	18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES > 1801 Law > 180114 Human Rights Law @ 100%
SEO Codes:	94 LAW, POLITICS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES > 9404 Justice and the Law > 940499 Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified @ 100%
Downloads:	Total: 394 Last 12 Months: 9
	More Statistics