Understanding characteristics that define the feasibility of conservation actions in a common pool marine resource governance system

Mills, Morena, Pressey, Robert L., Ban, Natalie C., Foale, Simon, Aswani, Shankar, and Knight, Andrew T. (2013) Understanding characteristics that define the feasibility of conservation actions in a common pool marine resource governance system. Conservation Letters, 6 (6). pp. 418-429.

[img] PDF (Published Version) - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

View at Publisher Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/conl.12025
 
28
13


Abstract

Effective conservation requires people to make choices about how they interact with the environment. Social characteristics influence the likelihood of establishing conservation actions with strong compliance (hereafter "feasibility"), but are rarely considered in conservation planning. Our study makes two contributions to understand feasibility. First, we explicitly test the associations between social characteristics and the presence and form of resource management. Second, we compare the ability of different types of data to elucidate feasibility. We use Ostrom's (2007) thinking on social-ecological systems and literature on resource management in Melanesia to create a context-specific framework to identify social characteristics that influence feasibility for conservation management. We then apply this framework and test for associations between the presence and form of management on one hand and social characteristics on the other, using data collected at different resolutions. We found that conservation feasibility was associated with characteristics of the governance system, users, and the social, economic, and political setting. Villages with different forms of management were more similar to each other socially than to villages without management. Social data collected at the resolution of households accounted for over double the variation in the form and presence of management compared to data at the resolution of villages. Our methods can be adapted to conservation planning initiatives in other socioeconomic settings.

Item ID: 31553
Item Type: Article (Research - C1)
ISSN: 1755-263X
Keywords: systematic conservation planning; spatial prioritization; coastal ecosystems; fisheries management; resource management; marine; Solomon Islands
Funders: Australian Research Council (ARC)
Date Deposited: 13 Mar 2014 23:19
FoR Codes: 16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY > 1601 Anthropology > 160104 Social and Cultural Anthropology @ 40%
05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES > 0502 Environmental Science and Management > 050209 Natural Resource Management @ 30%
14 ECONOMICS > 1402 Applied Economics > 140202 Economic Development and Growth @ 30%
SEO Codes: 96 ENVIRONMENT > 9605 Ecosystem Assessment and Management > 960507 Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Marine Environments @ 30%
95 CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING > 9503 Heritage > 950306 Conserving Pacific Peoples Heritage @ 30%
97 EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE > 970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society @ 40%
Downloads: Total: 13
More Statistics

Actions (Repository Staff Only)

Item Control Page Item Control Page